摘要
马克思在其著作中准确地论述了关于理想社会中的民主模式的现实前提以及民主模式的实质。马克思的民主模式鲜明地表达了“后政治”语境。这种直接民主模式既遭到了巴枯宁等无政府主义者的曲解,又受到当代自由主义者和新左派在内的西方学者的责难。而在现实的社会主义实践中也存在着类似的时序错位,未能充分意识到马克思民主模式是后政治民主或后资本主义民主的民主模式。由于这种时序错位,马克思民主模式的“后政治”语境在理论和实践中都被忽视、曲解和扭曲。
In his works, Marx expounds correctly the realistic premise and essence of the pattern of democracy in an ideal society. His pattern of democracy shows clearly the context of “post-politics”, which is misinterpreted by the anarchists such as Bakunin and blamed by contemporary western scholars including liberalists and neo-lefiists. Whereas, sequential offset also exists in practice and people don not realize that pattern of Marxist democracy is that of post-political democracy and post-capitalist democracy. Because of the sequential offset, the context of “post-politics” is neglected, misinterpreted and distorted both in theory and practice.
出处
《江苏行政学院学报》
2006年第1期82-86,共5页
The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
关键词
马克思
后政治
政治终结
Marx
Post-politics
Termination of Politics