期刊文献+

英国学派的方法论立场及其意义 被引量:1

The Methodological Standpoint and Its Significance of the English School
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英国学派是一个不同于美国主流学派的国际关系理论流派,它有独特的方法论和理论视野,其本体论的多元主义是与他们主张的方法论多元主义紧密相关的,因此,把握英国学派的方法论立场是理解其本体论多元主义的关键所在。英国学派采取多元主义方法论立场的结果,使他们能将国际体系、国际社会和世界社会的理论主张结合起来,对国际关系进行多层次、多维度的考察。英国学派的多元主义方法论不仅为综合各种各样的国际关系理论及其观点提供了一个一致的框架,而且为它们之间的对话架设了一个理想的平台。不过,英国学派方法论的多元主义也造成了其理论的内在矛盾和紧张。 The English School is an important theoretical one in the field of international relations that has its special research methodology and theoretical vision. For a long time, the academic community in international relations has been of the opinion that the English School holds to the traditional methodology of humanities while opposing “ scientific” methodology of natural science, which is actually sheer misunderstanding. A comprehensive survey of the works by the English School shows that although the English School insists on adopting the methods of humanities to study international relations, they do not reject any other “scientific” methods. Instead, they employ positivism, hermeneutics and critical theory. In other words, they actually adopt pluralism in methodology. The reasons that the English School adopts the their understanding of the complexity of international pluralistic stand in methodology are closely related with relations. They believe that the activities in the world political arena are both complicated and uncertain. Apart from international society, there exist other two conflicting elements: war and transnational unity or conflict. These different elements all exist in international society at the same time. Therefore, it is wrong to put excessive emphasis on the first element while denying the other two. Out of such a methodological stand, they hold that it is unnecessary to concretize the international system, international society and world society. methodological convenience. It is obvious, therefore, that the They have made such a division just for English School gives priority to methodology instead of the division. Out of such a consideration, they survey the international system, international society and world society from different analytical perspectives. The pluralistic methodological stands the English School has taken have laid a foundation for a ontological research into issues of wide scope, which and pluralistic dimensions by combining society. enables them to survey international theories of international system, relations from pluralistic levels international society and world The pluralism of the English School has not only offers a consistent framework for summing up various theories of international relations, but set up an ideal bridge for their dialogue. Nevertheless, the pluralism has also brought about inner contradictions and tensions among their theories. For this reason, the theoretical framework of the English School is still imperfect, and needs to be improved.
作者 章前明
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2006年第1期81-88,共8页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 南京大学"985工程"哲学社会科学创新基地基金资助项目
关键词 英国学派 方法论 多元主义 国际体系 国际社会 世界社会 国际关系 The English School pluralism of methodology international system international society world society significance
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1BUZAN B,LITTLE R. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2000: 104- 105.
  • 2JACKSON R. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.45 - 46.
  • 3HOLLIS M,SMITH S. Explaining and Understanding International Relations[M]. Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1990.1 -49.
  • 4亚历山大·温特 周丕启 译.国际关系中的建构关系和因果关系[A].提莫·邓恩 密切尔·考克斯 肯·布斯.八十年危机:1919-1999年的国际关系[C].北京:新华出版社,2003.158-184.
  • 5BULL H. International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach [A]. KNORR K, ROSENAU J N(eds. ). Contending Approaches to International Politics[C]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.20 - 38.
  • 6.西方国际关系理论:一种学科史视角的鸟瞰[A].朱瀛泉.国际关系评论[C].南京:南京大学出版社,2004.1-35.
  • 7LITTLE R. The English School's Contribution to the study of International Relations[J]. European Journal of International Relations, 2000,6(3) :395 - 422.
  • 8BULL H. The Theory of International Politics: 1919-1969 [A]. DERIAN J D(ed.).International Theory: Critical Investigations[C]. New York: New York University Press, 1995. 181 - 209.
  • 9WIGHT M. Why is there no International Theory? [A]. BUTTERFIELD H, WIGHT M(eds.). Diplomatic Investigations[C]. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1966.17 - 34.
  • 10JACKSON R, SORENSEN G. Introduction to International Relations[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

二级参考文献28

  • 1[美]亚历山大·温特 秦亚青译.《国际政治的社会理论》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年版.第440-445页.
  • 2[美]肯尼思·沃尔兹著 胡少华 王红缨译.《国际政治理论》[M].中国人民公安大学出版社,1992年版.第155页,第145页,第152-153页.
  • 3Joseph S,Nye,Jr,Understanding International Conflicts (New York HarperCollins,1993),p.30
  • 4Robert O.Keohane,Interantional Institutions and State Power (Boulder:Westview,1989).p.3
  • 5Wendt,Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999),p.141
  • 6Alexander Wendt,"Anarchy is What States Make of It:The Socia Construction of Power Politics,"International Organization,Vol.46,1992,pp.391-452
  • 7Robert Cox,"Social Foroes,States and World Order:Beyond International Relations,"in Robert Keohane ed.Neorealism and its Critics (New York:Columbia University Press,1986),pp.204-254
  • 8Waltz,Theory of Interantional Politics,p.68,p.95
  • 9Robert Keohane,International Institutions and State Power (Boulder, Westview,1989),p.8
  • 10Alexander Wendt,Social Theory of International Politics,pp.43,194,195,p.201,p.215

共引文献92

同被引文献46

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部