期刊文献+

精神损害赔偿法律制度的困境与出路

下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国现行的精神损害赔偿法律制度在人权法律保护上有重大进展,但仍存在诸多不足。解决问题的可能出路在于修改相关立法,把精神损害赔偿适用的范围扩大到刑事法领域,从而建立更为全面、更为完善的精神损害赔偿制度。这不仅是实现法律公平的需要,也是加强人权保护的需要。
作者 张爱玲
机构地区 北京工商大学
出处 《天中学刊》 2005年第6期26-28,共3页 Journal of Tianzhong
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献9

  • 1[1]Dan B. Dobbs, The Law of Torts, West Group, 2000.
  • 2[2]Restatement of Torts, 2nd, §46. Outrageous Conduct Causing Severe Emotional Distress (1) One who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emotional distress, and if bodily harm to the other results from it, for such bodily harm.
  • 3[3]§46. Outrageous Conduct Causing Severe Emotional Distress(2) Where such conduct is directed at a third person, the actor is subject to liability if he intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress(a) to a member of such person's immediate family who is present at the time, whether or not such distress results in bodily harm, or(b) to any other person who is present at the time, if such distress results in bodily harm.
  • 4[5]参见Supreme Court of California In Bank. 1989. 48 Cal.3d 644, 771 P.2d 814, 257 Cal.Rptr.865.
  • 5[6]参见Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980. 84 N.J. 88,417 A.2D 521.
  • 6[7]参见Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1987. 534 A.2d 1282.
  • 7[8]参见831 P2d 1197 (Cal. 1992).
  • 8[9]参见Supreme Court of California, 19 Cal.3d 441, 563 P.2d 858
  • 9[10]参见Court of Appeals of California, Fifth Appellate District, 170 Cal. App.3d 975, 216 Cal Rptr 581

共引文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部