期刊文献+

变异修辞的认知透视 被引量:5

Cognitive Studies of Deviated Rhetoric
下载PDF
导出
摘要 变异修辞包括辞格变异和非辞格变异两类,指的是刻意用偏离常规的方式运用语言材料以取得特定交际效果的现象。由于变异修辞是行文的非常手段,交际中其语言单位的原始意义须向动态的语用意义进行多层转换,其构建与解读更须依赖交际双方(尤其是接受方)的认知心理与状态,认知语言学自然成为分析变异修辞的一个理想的理论框架。利用认知语言学的基本原则,对变异修辞的发生、构建与解读机制进行初步探讨,认为变异修辞的种种手法如同隐喻一样,“不仅是语言的,也是概念的,行为的”,认知语言学对变异修辞的本质和运作机理具有极强的解释力。 Deviated rhetoric is refered to rhetoric figures and other similar linguistic means characteristic of their deviation from norm for specific communicative effects. In deviated - rhetoric communication, a multi - level transferability is necessary from the static primary meaning to the dynamic pragmatic meaning of the deviated - rhetoric embodied language, which makes its successful construction and conveyance more dependent on the cognitive psychology and process of both communicators especially the receptor. Cognitive linguistics can naturally serve as an ideal theoretical framework for its study. The paper follows the cogni- tive approach to analyze the occurrence, construction and conveyance of deviated rhetoric, with the conclusions that various forms of deviated rhetoric, as well as metaphor, are nat only “a matter of ordinary language” bat also “a matter of thought and action”, that cognitive linguistic can be employed to well explain how deviated rhetoric is made and how it works.
作者 肖建安 曾立
出处 《湖南人文科技学院学报》 2005年第6期89-92,共4页 Journal of Hunan University of Humanities,Science and Technology
基金 湖南省社科基金课题(03ZC82) 株洲市社科项目
关键词 变异 变异修辞 认知 deviation deviated rhetoric cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1文旭.认知语言学的研究目标、原则和方法[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(2):90-97. 被引量:155
  • 2Lakoff,G.& Johnson,M.Metaphors we live by[M].University of Chicago Press,1980.
  • 3李国南.辞格与词汇[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2002..
  • 4丁尔苏.论皮尔士的符号三分法[J].外国语文,1994,19(3):10-14. 被引量:51
  • 5Nesfield,J.C.& Wood F.t.Manual of English Grammar & Composition[M].London & Basingstoke:Macmillan Publishers Ltd,1964.
  • 6Sperber,D.& D.Wilson.Relevance:Communication and Cognition[M].Oxford:Blackwell,1986/1995.

二级参考文献20

  • 1文旭.国外认知语言学研究综观[J].外国语,1999,22(1):35-41. 被引量:191
  • 2文旭.认知语言学:诠释与思考[J].外国语,2001,24(2):29-36. 被引量:109
  • 3Chafe, W. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 4Dirven, R. & M. Verspoor. 1998. Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 5Fesmire, S. A. 1994. What is ‘cognitive' about cognitive linguistics? [J] Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9: 149-154.
  • 6Fillmore, C. 1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning [J]. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 123-131.
  • 7Fillmore, C. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language [J ]. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences 280: 20-32.
  • 8Fillmore, C. 1988. The mechanisms of construction grammar [J]. Berkeley Linguistic Society 14: 35-55.
  • 9Fillmore, C. et al. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of ‘let alone'[J]. Language 64: 501-38.
  • 10Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

共引文献215

同被引文献20

  • 1赵毅.修辞学应当研究接受效果[J].当代修辞学,1997(2):27-29. 被引量:2
  • 2陈广德,孙汝建.深层修辞理论研究[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1992,24(5):92-96. 被引量:1
  • 3孙致礼.翻译与叛逆[J].中国翻译,2001,22(4):18-22. 被引量:129
  • 4何自然.语言中的模因[J].语言科学,2005,4(6):54-64. 被引量:1825
  • 5SAUSSURE,F.D.Course in General Linguistics[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001:11-12.
  • 6张寿康.变异修辞学·序[J].武汉:湖北教育出版社,2004:1.
  • 7王尔德.理想丈夫与不可儿戏:王尔德的两出喜剧[M].余光中,译.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998:157.
  • 8申迎丽.理解与接受中意义的构成[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2008:124.
  • 9鲁迅.阿Q正传[M].梦远书城.现代文学.http://www.my285.com/xdwx/aqzz/.
  • 10冶秋.《阿Q正传》读书随笔[M]//路沙.论《阿Q正传》.桂林:草原书店,1941.

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部