期刊文献+

194例根尖周外科病例的生存分析

Assessment of survival function of 194 endodontic surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估194例根尖周外科病例的生存功能。方法:1991—2001年实行根尖周手术的患牙共194个被回访,在一套严格的标准下进行临床和X线检查。用Kap lan-M e ier方法和Log rank test来评估生存时间。用Cox回归分析混杂因素进行分析。结果:到回访时为止,154个初次手术牙齿的生存时间中位数是92.1个月[95%可信限区间(confidence interval,C.I.)=40.9,143.4],40个再次手术的牙齿生存时间中位数是39.1个月(95%C.I.=6.1,72.1);两组之间的生存时间具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。初次手术的牙齿,术前牙槽骨的边缘丧失高度和术者对生存时间具有显著性影响(P<0.05)。结论:根尖周手术的生存随时间延长呈非线性下降,术前牙槽骨的边缘丧失高度、术者和再手术是根尖手术生存的重要影响因素。 AIM:To assess the survival function of 194 endodontie surgery. METHODS: 194 surgically treated teeth between 1991 and 2001 were recalled and examined clinically and radiographically using a set of strict criteria. The Kaplan - Meier method and log rank test were used to evaluate the survival time, Confounded factors were ex- amined by Cox regression analysis, RESULTS:The median survival time of the 154 first - time surgically treated teeth was 92, 1 months (95% C. I, = 40.9,143,4) and that of the 40 re - surgical cases was 39.1 montbs (95% C.I. = 6.1,72, 1 ) up to the date of recall. There was a significant difference in the survival time between the two groups, For cases after first - time surgery,the ple - operative marginal bone loss and the operator had significant influence on the survival time (P 〈0.05). CONCLUSION:The survival time of surgical endodontic treatment declined non- linearly with time, The preoperative marginal bone loss,operator and re - surgery were important factors affecting the survival of this treatment modality.
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 2005年第12期678-683,共6页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
关键词 失败 根尖周手术 成功 生存分析 failure periapical surgery success survival analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Ericson S,Finne K,Persson G.Results of apicoectomy of maxillary canines,premolars and molars with special reference to oroantral communication as a prognostic factor[ J].Int J Oral Surg,1974,3(6):386-393.
  • 2Nordenram A,Svardstrom G.Results of apicectomy.A clinicalradiological examination [ J ].Sven Tandlak Tidskr,1970,63 (9):593-604.
  • 3Rud J,Andreasen JO,Jensen JE.A follow-up study of 1000 cases treated by endodontic surgery [ J].Int J Oral Surg,1972,1(4):215-228.
  • 4Lustmann J,Friedman S,Shaharabany V.Relation of pre-and intraoperative factors to prognosis of posterior periapical surgery[J].J Endod,1991,17(5):239-241.
  • 5Hirsch JM,Ahlstrom U,Henrikson P A,et al.Periapical surgery[ J ].Int J Oral Surg,1979,8 (3):173-185.
  • 6Malmstrom M,Perkki K,Lindquist K.Apicectomy.A retrospective study [ J ].Proc Finn Dent Soc,1982,78 (1):26-31.
  • 7Rud J,Andreasen JO.A study of failures after endodontic surgery by radiographic,histologic and stereomicroscopic methods [ J ].Int J Oral Surg,1972,1(6):311-328.
  • 8Mikkonen M,Kullaa-Mikkonen A,Kotilainen R.Clinical and radiologic re-examination of apicoectomized teeth [ J ].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol,1983,55 (3):302-306.
  • 9Altonen M,Mattila K.Follow-up study of apicoectomized molars[ J ].Int J Oral Surg,1976,5 (1):33-40.
  • 10Rapp EL,Brown CE,Newton CW.An analysis of success and failure of apicoectomies [ J ].J Endod,1991,17 (10):508-512.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部