期刊文献+

Resource Flows of Villages with Contrasting Lifestyles in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Central Himalaya, India

Resource Flows of Villages with Contrasting Lifestyles in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Central Himalaya, India
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Resource use efficiency analyses of village ecosystem are necessary for effective and efficient planning of resource utilization. This paper deals with economic and energy input-output analyses of different components of village ecosystem in representative buffer zone villages, which are practicing transhumance and settled way of lifestyles in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (NDBR) of Garhwal Himalaya. While the villages practicing transhumance used various natural resources spatially segregated,the villages practicing settled way of lifestyle have to manage resources from a limited spatial area through rotation and varied extraction intensities. Forests subsidized the production activity in both type of villages and the per capita resource extractions were found to be greater in transhumance village than settled village. Though crops provided maximum energy, in terms of economic criteria, animal husbandry played important role in both settled and transhumance villages. As villages representing both the situations showed different ways of adjustments to the conservation oriented land use changes, management authority needs to address theeco-development plans fulfilling the aspirations of all people traditionally using the resources of the Reserve to reduce the conflicts and encourage their participation in the conservation of the area. Resource use efficiency analyses of village ecosystem are necessary for effective and efficient planning of resource utilization. This paper deals with economic and energy input-output analyses of different components of village ecosystem in representative buffer zone villages, which are practicing transhumance and settled way of lifestyles in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve (NDBR) of Garhwal Himalaya. While the villages practicing transhumance used various natural resources spatially segregated,the villages practicing settled way of lifestyle have to manage resources from a limited spatial area through rotation and varied extraction intensities. Forests subsidized the production activity in both type of villages and the per capita resource extractions were found to be greater in tran^humance village than settled village. Though crops provided maximum energy, in terms of economic criteria, animal husbandry played important role in both settled and transhumance villages. As villages representing both the situations showed different ways of adjustments to the conservation oriented land use changes, management authority needs to address the eco-development plans fulfilling the aspirations of all people traditionally using the resources of the Reserve to reduce the conflicts and encourage their participation in the conservation of the area.
出处 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2005年第4期271-293,共23页 山地科学学报(英文)
关键词 印度 乡村生态系统 资源利用率 生活方式 自然资源 农业生态 Himalaya resource flow natural resource management protected area network sustainable development transhumance village ecosystem
  • 相关文献

参考文献62

  • 1[1]Anonymous.2001.Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators.A Methodological Guide.Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,Luxembourg.
  • 2[2]Ashish,M.1983.Agricultural Economy Of Kumaun Hills:Threat of Ecological Disaster.In:J.S.Singh,S.P.,Singh and C.Shastri,(eds.),The Himalaya:Nature,Man and Culture.Gyanodaya Prakashan,Nainital,India.Pp.123-127.
  • 3[3]Azeez,P.K.,N.K.Ramachandran,and V.S.Vijayan.1992.The Socio-economics of the Villages Keoladeo National Park,Bharatpur (Rajasthan),India.International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 18:169~179.
  • 4[4]Berkes,F.,J.Colding,and C.Folke.2000.Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management.Ecological Applications 10:1251~1262.
  • 5[5]Bhuller,B.S.,and J.P.Mittal.1990.Energy Requirements for Wheat Production in a Selected Village of Punjab.Journal of Rural Technology 2:9~22.
  • 6[6]Bringezu,S.,M.Fischer-Kowalski,R.Kleijn,and V.Palm.editors.1997.Regional and National Material Flow Accounting:From Paradigm to Practice of Sustainability.Proceedings of the ConAccount Workshop,Leiden.Wuppertal Institute for Climate,Environment and Energy,Wuppertal.
  • 7[7]Das S.K.1981.Plan for Afforestation in Civil-soyam,Panchayat and Pasture Land and Solving the Problem of Fuel,Wood Material for Agricultural Appliances and Fodder for Livestock by Managing the Grazing Lands of Almora District.Unpublished report,District Magistrate,Almora,India.
  • 8[8]Farooquee,N.A.,and K.S.Rao.1999.Conservation and Utilization of Indigenous Cattle and Livestock among the Transhumance Pastoralists of Kumaon Himalaya (India).Journal of Environmental Systems 27:311~323.
  • 9[9]Fischer-Kowalski,M.,and H.Haberl.1993.Metabolism and Colonization,Modes of Production and the Physical Exchange between Societies and Nature.Innovation in Social Sciences Research 6:415.
  • 10[10]Gopalan,C.,B.V.Ramasastri,and S.C.Balasubramaniam.1978.Nutritive Value of Indian Foods.National Institute of Nutrition,Hyderabad,India.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部