4Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A ,et al. Population- based mammography screening: comparison of screen - film and full - field digital mammography with soft - copy readints-Oslo Ⅰ study[J]. Radiology, 2003,229(3 ) :877.
5Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen - film mammography versus full - field digital mammography with soft - copy reading: randomized trial in a population- based screening program-the Oslo Ⅱ Study[J]. Radiology,2004,232(1):197.
6Fischmann A, Siagmann KC, Wersebe A, et al. Comparison of full - field digital mammagravhy and film - screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection[J]. Br J Radiol, 2005,78(928) : 312.
8Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer - aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center [J]. Radiology, 2001,220(3) :781.
9Cupples TE, Cunningham JE, Reynolds JC. Impact of computer - aided detection in a regional screening mammography program [ J ]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005,185(4) :944.
4[1]Burbank F.Stereotactic breast biopsy:comparison of 14-and 11-gauge Mammotome probe performance and complication rates.Am Surg, 1997,63(11):988-995
5[2]Meloni GB,Dessole S,Becchere MP,et al.Ultrasound-guided mammotome vacuum biopsy for the diagnosis of impalpable breast lesions.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2001 ,18(5):520-524
7[4]Joshi M,Duva-Frissora A,Padmanabhan R,et al.Atypical ductal hyperplasia in stereotactic breast biopsies:enhanced accuracy of diagnosis with the mammotome.Breast J,2001,7(4):207-213
9Osako T, Iwase T, Takahashi K, et al. Diagnostic mammography and ultrasonography for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years. Breast Cancer, 2007, 14 (3) :255-259.
10Alder DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990,16:553-558.
