期刊文献+

“科学大战”与性别视角下的科学 被引量:1

"SCIENCE WAR" AND SCIENCE FROM A GENDER ANGLE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “科学大战”(Sc ience W ar)最本质的冲突,是科学与人文的分裂及其带来的矛盾。分裂的根源在于它们的研究者们的“傲慢与偏见”,消除偏见的最有效的方法莫过于双方共同努力去进行沟通,去真正了解对方。鉴于以上原因,笔者针对我国学界对女性主义关于科学与性别的研究的误解甚至是曲解,介绍了女性主义的科学观,指出女性主义对科学与性别的批判并不是对科学的客观性和科学理性的彻底否定,更没有对科学的发展造成破坏作用,而是为了对以男性为中心的科学领域提供一种平衡的影响,使科学更健康地发展。 "Science War" ' s essential conflict is the breakup between science and humanity and the contradiction which the breakup brings about. The breakup originates from the researchers' "pride and prejudice". However, the most effective approach to do away with prejudice is that both sides try their best to communicate and understand the opposite side really. In view of the above-mentioned causes, counting China' s academic circles' misunderstanding and deliberately misinterpreting researches into science and gender by femininism, the author introduces femininism' s scienrific standpoint, pointing out that femininism criticising science and gender won' t negate objectivity and scientific rationalism, nor will feminism damage scientific development. Instead, feminism will provide a balanced impact in the masculine-centred scientific realm so that science will develop healthily,
作者 聂馥玲
出处 《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2005年第6期31-34,共4页 Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词 科学大战 女性主义 性别 科学 客现性 science war femininism gender science objectivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献4

  • 1Overfield,Kathy.Purity and the Scientific Ethic.In Men’s Studies Modified:The Impact of Feminism on the Academic Disciplines[M].Dale Spender.New York:Pergamon Press,1981.247.
  • 2Kdler, Evdyn Fox. Reflections on Gender and Science [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.75.
  • 3Harding Sandra. , Is Science Multicultural? Challenges, Re-sources, Opportunities, Uncertainties. Configurations 22.1994. 319.
  • 4Harding, Sandra. Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is "Strong Objectivity"? in Feminism and Science. Edited by E.F.Keller and H. E. Longino, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, 1996. 172.

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部