摘要
目的比较高龄患者开胸手术两种不同麻醉与镇痛方法的效果。方法将28例高龄病人分成两组,Ⅰ组18例,采用全麻-硬膜外联合麻醉,术中维持用异丙酚2~3mg/(kg·h)微泵静滴及硬膜外追加1.0%利多卡因、0.25%罗哌卡因,必要时按需吸入少量异氟醚,术后行硬膜外镇痛。Ⅱ组10例,采用静吸复合全麻,术中维持用异丙酚3~4mg/(kg·h)及吸入异氟醚维持,术后行静脉镇痛。分别监测两组病人麻醉前、插管即刻、去肋开胸、手术探查、拔管时的SBP、DBP、HR,术后清醒时间,术毕躁动及术后镇痛效果情况。结果Ⅰ组病人麻醉及手术过程中,BP、HR平稳,术后患者苏醒快,苏醒质量及术后镇痛效果佳;Ⅱ组病人则BP、HR波动较大,且患者苏醒相对缓慢,苏醒质量及术后镇痛效果相对欠佳。结论Ⅰ组全麻-硬膜外联合麻醉及术后镇痛效果明显优于Ⅱ组全麻及术后静脉镇痛。
Objective To compare the effects of two anesthetic and analgesia methods in old patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Methods Twenty - eight patients were divided into two groups randdomly: 18 patients in group I received combined general - epidural anesthesia, followed by intravenous infusion of propofol 2 ~ 3mg/( kg · h) and 1.2% lidocaine as well as 0.25% ropivacaine through epidural administration. Isoflurane was inhalated if necessary after intubation. Ten patients in group Ⅱ received complex anesthesia of intravenous drip and inhalation , infusion of propofol 3 ~ 4ml/( kg · h) and inhalation of isoflurane. SBP,DBP,HR and the time of consciousness recovery as wall as restlessness, effect of analgesia were recorded before and after intubation and anesthesia. Group Ⅰ was received epidural analgesia and group Ⅱ received vein analgesia. Results Patients in group Ⅰ had stabler BP and HR than that in group Ⅱ ,and recovery of consciousness in group Ⅰ was quicker and better in quality as well as effect of analgesia than that in group Ⅱ. Conclusion The effect of anesthetic and analglesia method of group Ⅰ is much better than that in group Ⅱ.
出处
《临床医学》
CAS
2006年第1期29-30,共2页
Clinical Medicine