期刊文献+

五种检测幽门螺杆菌感染方法的评估 被引量:1

Evaluation of 5 Detection Methods for Hp Infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对五种检测幽门螺杆菌(Hp)感染的方法进行评估。方法对193例有胃肠道症状患者进行快速尿素酶试验(RUT)、组织学检(Warthin-Starry)、13C-尿素呼气试验(13C-UBT)、幽门螺杆菌粪便抗原 (HpSA)、幽门螺杆菌聚合酶链反应(Hp-PCR)五项试验,以上述五项中二项阳性为Hp阳性,全部五项阴性为 Hp阴性作为“金标准”。结果 193例患者按“金标准”诊断Hp阳性94例,阴性99例,RUT、组织学检查(W-S 银染)、13C-UBT、HpSA、Hp-PCR敏感度分别为:78.9%、72.9%、93.6%、89.6%、76.0%,特异度:78.6%、97.9%、 91.9%、90.7%、97.9%,准确度:78.8%、85.5%、92.9%、90.2%、86.5%,阳性预测值:78.1%、97.2%、91.7%、90.5%、 97.4%,阴性预测值:79.4%、78.5%、93.8%、89.8%、99.1%。结论 13C-UBT、HpSA试验是诊断Hp感染及追踪 Hp根治的简便、准确和非侵入性的检查方法。 Objective To evaluate 5 detection methods for Hp infection. Methods 193 patients with upper digestive tract symptoms were diagnosed by 5 tests: RUT, Warthin-Starry test, ^13C-UBT, HpSA, and Hp-PCR. It's the golden standard that 2 or more than 2 of the 5 tests positive mean Hp infection and all 5 tests negative mean without Hp infection. Results According to the gold standard,94 cases of all 193 patients were diagnosed Hp infection positive and other 99 were negative.Sensi tivities of all 5 tests: RUT, Warthin-Starry test, 13C-UBT, HpSA, and Hp-PCR, are 78.9%, 72.9%,93.6%, 89.6% and 76.0%, respectively; specificities are 78.6%, 97.9% ,91.9% ,90.7 % and 97.9%, respectively; accuracies are 78.8% ,85.5% ,92.9% ,90.2% and 86.5% respectively;positive predictive values are 78.1% ,97.2%, 91.7% ,90.5% and 97.4%,respectively;negative predictive values are 79.4%,78.5%,93.8% ,89.8% and 99.1%, respectively. Conclusion ^13C-UBT, and HpSA are the two simple, accurate and noninvasive detection methods for diagnosis and following up of Hp infection.
机构地区 东莞市人民医院
出处 《热带医学杂志》 CAS 2006年第1期39-41,共3页 Journal of Tropical Medicine
关键词 幽门螺杆菌 感染 ^13C-UBT HPSA Helicobacter pylori infection ^13C-UBT HpSA
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1MCCA Nulty.Pathogenicity of Campylobacter pylori-a causative factor in gastritis.Scand[J].J Gastroenterol Suppl,1989,24(suppl 160):1603-1606.
  • 2Vaira D,Vakil N.Blood,urine,stool,breath,moner,and Helicobacter pylori[J].Gut,2001,48:287-289.
  • 3胡伏莲,张万岱,萧树东.对幽门螺杆菌若干问题的共识意见(2003·中国)[J].中华医学杂志,2004,84(6):522-523. 被引量:195
  • 4胡伏连 周殿元.幽门螺杆菌感染的基础与临床[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2002.155-164.
  • 5董玲,孙剑勇,王吉耀.幽门螺杆菌感染不同检测方法的评价[J].中华消化杂志,2004,24(4):235-236. 被引量:46
  • 6Braden B,Duan LP,Caspary WF,et al.More convenlent ^13C-urea breath test modifications still meet the criteria for vatid diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection[J].Z Gastroentero,1994,32:198-202.
  • 7Vaira D,Holton J,Menegatti M,et al.New immunological assays for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection[J].Gut,1999,45 (suppl1):123-127.
  • 8Vaira D,Malfertheiner P,Megrand F,etal.Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection with a new noninvasive antigenbased assay.HpSa European study group[J].Lancet,1999,354(9172):30-33.
  • 9Richter J,Grimmova M,Stiboroval I,et al.Detection of Helicobacter pylori in the saliva of patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis[J].Case Lek Cesk,2003,142(11):665-669.
  • 10Kabir S.Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in feces and saliva by polymerase chain reaction:a revien[J].Helicobacter,2004,9(2):115-123.

二级参考文献5

  • 1MCCA Nulty.Pathogenicity of Campylobacter pylori-a causative factor in gastritis.Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl,1989,1603-1606.
  • 2Hung CT,Leung WK,Chan FK,et al.Comparison of two new rapid serology tests for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese patients.Dig Liver Dis,2002,34:111-115.
  • 3Leung WK,Chow TP,Ng EK,et al.Validation of a new immunoblot assay for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori in the Asian population.Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2001,15:423-428.
  • 4张万岱.幽门螺杆菌若干问题的共识意见[J].中华消化杂志,2000,20(2):117-118. 被引量:387
  • 5李岩.幽门螺杆菌检测方法[J].中国实用内科杂志,2002,22(1):15-16. 被引量:27

共引文献238

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部