期刊文献+

默认语义学对语义学、语用学界面的研究及其评价 被引量:7

Book Review: Default Semantics
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文阐释K.M.Jaszczolt提出的对语义/语用界面研究的一种新的解释理论——默认语义学。该理论认为语言交际的意图性就是语言表达式的指称性。语义的确立是默认推理的结果,默认推理是交际者根据交际意图的类型和强弱,即指称性的强弱而进行的自动推理,是对意图识别的结果,并非对语境的选择。由此认为,语言的意义是动态的统一体,并不存在语义/语用的界面分歧。该理论被用于解释存在于限定摹状词、预设表达式、否定、连接词、数词等方面的语义含混现象。最后,本文对其解释作用做出了相应的评价,指出该研究在理论的实证性、分类依据以及普遍性方面仍有待深入研究。 This paper is to introduce a new theory of explaining the semantics/pragmatics interface——default semantics, by K. M. Jaszczolt. In the theory, intentionality in communication is understood as the referentiality of linguistic expressions. The establishment of semantic meanings is the result of default reasoning, which is automatic based on intentions (referentiality) in communication with various types and strengths. Fixing on a semantic meaning is not the process of selecting context but identifying primary intention, with dynamic and unitary semantic meaning. There is no semantics/pragmatics boundary dispute. The theory is applied to explain such semantic ambiguities as in definite descriptions, presupposition expressions, negation, sentential connectives and number terms. Finally, the paper tries to comment on the theory and points out that further empirical research on principles of categorization and universality of this theory is needed.
作者 张权 李娟
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期69-73,共5页 Journal of Foreign Languages
基金 江苏省哲学社会科学研究"十五"规划课题论文
关键词 默认语义学 意图性 语义歧义 语法 普遍性 default semantics intentionality semantic ambiguity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1束定芳.现代语义学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2002..
  • 2Grice, H. E Studies in the Way of words[M].Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
  • 3Carston, R. Postscript to Carston 1988[A]. A.Kasher. Pragmatics: Critical Concepts Vol. 4[C].London:Routledge, 1998.
  • 4Bach, K. Conversational impliciture[J]. Mind and Language, 1994, (9): 124-162.
  • 5Jaszczolt, K. M. The“default de re”principle for the interpretation of belief utterances[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1997, (28): 315-336.
  • 6Jaszczolt, K. M. Discourse, Beliefs, and Intentions:Semantic Defaults and Propositional Attitude Ascription[M]. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 1999.
  • 7Jaszczolt, K. M. Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 8Bach, K. Default reasoning: jumping to conclusions and knowing when to think twice[J]. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 1984, (65): 37-58.
  • 9Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. Relevance:Communication and Cognition[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1986.
  • 10Donnellan, K. S. Reference and definite descriptions[J]. Philosophical Review, 1966, (75):281-304.

共引文献11

同被引文献69

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部