期刊文献+

冷战后美国国防工业的重组 被引量:7

The Restructuring of American Defense Industry after the End of the Cold War
原文传递
导出
摘要 冷战后美国国防工业进行了重组,一方面组建了巨大的国防承包商,另一方面走军民一体化道路,并在武器装备上进行国际合作,以构建新的国防工业体系。出现这种情况的原因是多方面的,这既是冷战遗留下来的国防生产能力过剩,也是美国希望保持军事技术优势、美国国家安全观的改变和军事转型的需要,以及新军事变革的需要。美国国防工业的重组也给美国和世界带来不容忽视的影响。它在保持美国科技优势,在可预见的将来为保持美国一超独霸地位提供条件,扩大大型国防公司对国家政策影响力的同时,也给美国带来了新的安全困境。 After the end of the Cold War, American defense industry underwent restructuring. Huge defense contractors emerged, dual use of military and civilian production was integrated, and international cooperation in weaponry was introduced. The reason for such restructuring is multifaceted. It is due to the overproduction in the defense industry, a legacy of the Cold War. It is also out of the wish of maintaining superiority in military technology. The change in the perception of national security and the need of military transformation also play a role. The restructuring of the defense industry also has made a great impact on the United States and the rest of the world. It provides conditions for the United States to maintain its superpower status in the foreseeable future and expands the influence of big defense-oriented corporations on national policies. But, at the same time, it also brings a new security dilemma.
作者 何奇松
出处 《美国研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第4期114-131,共18页 The Chinese Journal of American Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1斯德哥尔摩和平研究所 中国军控与裁军协会译.《SIPRI年鉴 2003:军备、裁军和国际安全》[M].世界知识出版社,2004年版.第472页.
  • 2Murray Weidenbaum, "The U, S. Defense Industry after the Cold War," Orbis, Summer 1997,p. 594.
  • 3斯德哥尔摩和平研究所.《SIPRI年鉴2003,军备、裁军和国际安全》[M].,.第472页、475页.
  • 4Harry G. Summer, Jr. , "Operation, Procurement, and Industrial Base," Orbis, Spring 1997,p. 207.
  • 5Andy Serwer, "In War and Peace, General Dynamics Is Wall's Street's Favorite Defense Contractor," Fortune, Vol. 144, no. 9, November 12, 2001, p. 143.
  • 6Washington Post, May 27, 2003.
  • 7.《应关注转制科研院所的管理问题》[N].《科技日报》,2003年5月9日09~12版.
  • 8.[EB/OL].人民网,2003年7月28日.
  • 9美国国会技术评价局.《军民一体化的潜力报告》[R].中国国防科技信息中心,1995年..
  • 10Ivan Eland, "Can the Pentagon Be Run Like A Business?" Issue In Science and Technology,Spring 2002, pp. 79-84.

二级参考文献27

  • 1"Military-Industrial Complex Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961," http://www, yale. edu/lawweb/avalon/presiden/speeches/eisenhower001, htm.
  • 2Paul A C Koistinen, The Military-Industrial Complex: A Historical Perspective (New York, Praeger Publishers, 1980), p. vii.
  • 3William S Cohen, Secretary of Defense, Report of the Quadrennial Defense Review (Washington DC: U.S. Department of Defense, May 1997), http://www, defenselink, mil/pubs/qdr/.
  • 4William D. Hartung, "Military-Industrial Complex Revisited: How Weapons Makers are Shaping U. S. Foreign and Military Politics," http://www. foreignpolicy-infocus, org/papers/micr/star_warriors, html.
  • 5William D. Hartung, "Military-Industrial Complex Revisited: How Weapons Makers are Shaping U.S. Foreign and Military Politics," http://www. foreignpolicy-infocus, org/papers/micr/star_warriors, html.
  • 6"National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002,"http://www. globalsecurity,org/military/library/congress/2001_rpt/sr062, htm.
  • 7Miehelle Ciarroeea and William D. Hartung, "Axis Of Influence: Behind the Bush Administration's Missile Defense Revival," http://www, worldpoliey, org/projeets/arms/reports/axisofinfluenee, html.
  • 8William D. Hartung, "Military-Industrial Complex Revisited: How Weapons Makers are Shaping U.S. Foreign and Military Polities. ".
  • 9William D. Hartung and Miehelle Ciarroeea, "Tangled Web: The Marketing of Missile Defense, 1994 - 2000," http ://www. worldpolicy, org/projects/arms/reports/tangled, htm.
  • 10Michelle Ciarrocca and William D. Hartung, "Axis Of Influence: Behind the Bush Administration's Missile Defense Revival. ".

共引文献18

同被引文献77

引证文献7

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部