摘要
目的:比较ELISA TP-IgG和快速血浆反应素试验(rap id p lasm a reagin c irc le card test,RPR)梅毒检测试剂的敏感性和特异性。方法:采用ELISA TP-IgG和RPR 2种试剂同时对56份临床疑似标本进行检测,结果阳性者采用梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体乳胶凝集试验(Toreponem a pallidum latex immuno assay,TPLA)方法进行验证。结果:ELISA TP-IgG检测率高于RPR,且与TPLA确证实验完全吻合。结论:ELISA TP方法在敏感性和特异性方面均好于RPR方法,是临床检测梅毒感染和筛选献血员的首选方法。
Objective: To compare the specificity and sensitivity of two methods for testing antibody of Trcponema pallidum(TP). Methods: Fifty-six blood plasmas of patients were tested by ELISA TP-IgG and rapid plasma reagin circle card test (RPR). Positive results were validated by Torcponema pallidum latex immuno assay (TPLA). Results: The efficiency of ELISA TPdgG is higher than that of RPR. The test results of ELISA TP-IgG is accorded with that of TPLA. Conclusion: ELISA TP is more specific and sensitive than RPR, ELISA is more suitable for testing clinical TP infected persons and screening of blood donors.
出处
《沈阳医学院学报》
2005年第4期227-228,共2页
Journal of Shenyang Medical College
关键词
梅毒螺旋体
ELISA
快速血浆反应素试验
Treponema pallidum(TP)
ELISA
(rapid plasma reagin circle acrd test) RPR