一起保险纠纷引发的思考——论不真正连带债务

A Thought To An Insurance Issue——On Untrue Joint Debt

一起失窃案引发三方纠纷,源起对案件性质认识不同。是连带债务还是不真正连带债务?我国《民法通则》没有规定不真正连带债务,而是将其与连带债务不加区分。因此,也导致了在司法实践中对不真正连带债务适用了更加严格的连带规则,造成了某种程度的不公。不真正连带债务与连带债务的内涵有所不同,表现形式上也存在很大差异。司法实践应当对二者进行区分,并区别对待。

There is no rule about the untrue joint debt in the General Principles of the Civil Law of the Peoples Republic of China. In the practice of the administration of justice, there joint rules applied to the untrue joint debt are strict more and more. It is unfair to the untrue joint debtor to recognize them as the joint debtor. The content of untrue joint debt is different that of joint debt They should be treated distinctively.