摘要
本文认为,黑格尔的错误是把对立面统一绝对化,旧教材的错误则是把两极对立绝对化,特别是把唯心论和唯物论的对立绝对化了,殊不知阶级社会源于“心物”对立或脑体分工,把“心物”对立绝对化就是使阶级社会永恒化。再说哲学也只有形而上学和辩证法两大派,因此教材对唯心唯物的划分纯属画蛇添足,而对马克思哲学观的理解也未免失之偏颇!
It is held that Heiger eiTor lies in absolutes in terms of unity of the opposites, the error of the old teaching materials is absolutes of two extremes opposites, especially the absolutes in terms of opposites between the idealism and the materialism, but class society stems from the opposites between the idealism and the materialism or division betwcen mental and manual labour, absoiutes of the opposites between the idealism and the materialism just eternalizes class society. Besides, philosophy only has metaphysics and dialectics, so dividing the idealism and the materialism in teaching materials sheerly draws a snake and adds feet to it, this is really defect of being too partial concerning the understanding of Marxist philosophy.
出处
《青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2006年第1期29-33,共5页
Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
“心物”对立
两极对立
相对意义
绝对化
opposites between the idealism and the materialism
opposites between two extremes
relative value
absoiutes