SPM电脑测试与纸笔测试的结果比较

Comparative Study of a Computer-based Test and a Paper-and-pencil Test on Raven' s Standard Progressive Matrices Performance of College Students

目的检验SPM电脑测试和纸笔测试方式的等值性和优劣性。方法以145名大学生作为研究对象,采用单因素完全随机实验设计,用t检验和方差分析的统计方法,检验两种测试方式之间的差异。结果两种测试类型的检验:t=1.448,P=0.150,不同性别的检验:t=2.842,P=0.005。结论1不管那一种测试方式都不会影响瑞文推理测验的总分,两种测试方式基本等值;2实验结果的外部效度需要进一步验证。

Objective To verify equivalence of the Computer-based test and the Paper-ana-pencil test on Raven＇s Standard Progressive Matrices Performance. Methods The paper explored the total score of the Raven＇s Standard Progressive Matrices of 145 graduate students. The study used complete sample design two levels： the computer-based test （CBT） and the paper-and-pencil test （PPT）. Results The inspection between Computer-based test and the Paper-and-pencil test： t=1. 448, P= 0. 150, sex： t = 2. 842, P= 0. 005. Conclusion The following results were obtained ：①Neither CBT or PPT has no significant difference on examinee performance. ②We should need to analysis the external validity of this research.