期刊文献+

东海西海,心理攸同——以文学为例试论中西文化的大同性 被引量:5

On the Grand Commonality of Chinese and Western Cultures
原文传递
导出
摘要 中西文化相同?相异?如果是相同,那是全同还是大同小异?如果是相异,那是迥异还是大异小同?这些问题极为复杂,极难作答。学问渊博、通晓多种西方语言的钱钟书,综览中西文化后,认为“东海西海,心理攸同”。他在《管锥编》等著述中,博引中西典籍为例,证明其说,笔音在本文中,加添几个例证:(1)中西诗学的抒情说和摹仿说,名目不同,而实际相通;(2)比喻与对比之运用,为中西修辞论所重视,为中西作家所认同;(3)17世纪英国作家所写的一篇文学批评,竞与中国古代文评相通。这是另一个“心理攸同”。教十年来,笔者观书阅世,深然钱钟书说法,认为中西文化虽有形形式式的歧异,二者却是“心同”、“理同”的,是谓“大同”。本文也略论亨建顿所谓的“文明冲突”。 Are Chinese and Western cultures the same or different? Are they coalpletely identical, generally identical, generally different or completely different? These are extremely complex and difficult to answer. The late Qian Zhongshu contends that "the hearts and minds of peoples by the East Sea and by the West Sea are the same. " Qian in his works including the voluminous Limited Views: Essays on ideas and Letters has provided us with hundreds of pieces of evidence to demonstrate his view. In this article, the author adds more: (1) anaffinity underlying the superficial contrast between lyricism and mimesis in Chinese and Western poetics; (2) the universal usage of metaphor and antithesis in Chinese and Western rhetoric ; (3) a work of literary criticism by a 17^th century English poet sharing the same ideas with Chinese poetics, and thus showing a close similarity between Chinese and Western criticism. In his many years of study and observation, this author has shared Qian's view that despite the existence of various differences there are affinities between Chinese and Western cultures ; he calls these the Grand Commonality ( or "Datong" ) of Chinese and Western cultures. In this article, the author also touches upon a hotly debated issue of "the clash of civlizations" as initiated by Samuel Huntington.
作者 黄维樑
出处 《中国比较文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期84-99,共16页 Comparative Literature in China
关键词 中西文化 大同 文学批评 钱钟书 Chinese and Western cultures Grand Commonality literary criti-cism Qian Zhongshu
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking Of World Order( NY :Touchstone, 1997 ).
  • 2梁漱溟.《东西文化及其哲学》[M].商务印书馆,1922年版..
  • 3钱钟书.《国史大纲》《引论》[M].台北:国立编译馆,1976年修订再版本.第12页.
  • 4钱钟书.《谈艺录》序言[M].北京三联书店,2002年..
  • 5M. H. Abram, et al, ed. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 4th ed. , N. Y: W. W. Norton & Co. , 1979;pp. 163-164.
  • 6Preface to The Lyrical Ballads (1802).
  • 7The Mirror and the Lamp( N. Y. : Oxford University Press,1971. ).
  • 8.《诗学》第6章[M].,..
  • 9.《清通与多姿》[M].香港文化事业有限公司,1981年..
  • 10《略说中西思维方式:比较文论的一个议题》[J].香江文坛,2002,.

共引文献8

同被引文献30

  • 1赵俊霞.对诗学正义的追求——论香港沙田派文论家黄维梁的文学批评[J].重庆职业技术学院学报,2003,12(3):71-72. 被引量:1
  • 2錢锺书.通感[J].文学评论,1962(1):13-17. 被引量:112
  • 3曹顺庆.文论失语症与文化病态[J].文艺争鸣,1996(2):50-58. 被引量:462
  • 4褚孝泉.通感考[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),1997,39(4):87-91. 被引量:31
  • 5黄维樑.《最早的中国文学史:(文心雕龙·时序)》,苏州2004年11月5-8日“中国文学史百年研究(1904-2004)国际研讨会”论文.
  • 6王礼卿.《文心雕龙通解》,台北黎明文化事业1986年版.
  • 7Karen Alkalay-Gut, The Poetry of September 11:The Testimonial Imperative, Poetics Today, Summer 2005.
  • 8黄维樑.《重新发现中国古代文化的作用》,《中国古典文论新探》,北京大学出版社1996年版,第9-23页.
  • 9黄维樑.《(文心雕龙)“六观法”和文学作品的评析》,《中国古典文论新探》,北京大学出版社1996年版,第24-37页.
  • 10James J.Y. Liu, Chinese Theories of Literature, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部