4Honeywell, Inc., v. Metz Apporatewerke, 509 F.2d 1137, 184 USPQ 387 (7th Cir. 1975). Johns Hopkins University v. Cellpro, 931 F. Supp. 303 (D.Del. 1996).
5Chisum : Chisum on Patents, section 17.0414][f].
6Baut v. Pethick Construction Co., 262 F. Supp.350, 152 USPQ 212 (M.D. Pa. 1966).
7Chisum : Chisum on Patents, section 17.0414][b],(1998 supp.) quoting Hewlett Packard Co v. Bausch & Lomb Inc. 909 F. 2d 1464, 15 USPQ2d 1525 (Fed.Cir. 1990).
8E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co., 903 F. Supp. 680 (D.Del. 1995), C. Van der Lely N. Kv. F. Ili Maschio S.n.c., 222 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 399 (S.D.Ohio 1984).
9Preemptive Devices Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 803 F. 2d 1170, 231 USPQ 297 (Fed. Cir. 1986),Fonor Corp. v. General Electric Co., 902 F. Supp. 330 (E.D. NY 1995).
10Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco Ltd. 850 F. 2d 660, 7 USPQ2d 1097, (Fed. Cir. 1988), Baldwin Technology Corp. v. Dahlgren International Inc., 27 USPQ2d 1096, 1102 (N. D. Tex. 1992).
