期刊文献+

Monty Hall Dilemma的困难原因探讨 被引量:5

Causes of Monty Hall Dilemma's Difficulty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用Monty Hall Dilemma的经典研究范式,探讨了大学生被试在不同提示条件下对MHD问题的解决情况,结果发现只有在条件关系提示下,MHD的作业成绩才得到了明显的改善,但是正确率也只有35.7%。这表明MHD问题困难的原因很可能是多方面的,如认为主持人的行为完全是随机事件,很难意识到参与者的最初选择与主持人打开特定盒子间的三种条件关系;多数被试作出选择的理由是非理性的,如“坚持第一选择,相信自己的直觉”;不能正确判断MHD问题的内在概率关系以及缺乏认真思考的动力等。 This article used the classical model of Monty Hall Dilemma to study undergraduates' cognitive process in resolving the problem under several different hints. The results indicated that there was a distinct improvement under the hint of conditional connections but the percentage of correct response was only 35.7 %, which suggested that there were several causes of Monty Hall Dilemma's difficulty, such as thinking that Monty's behaviour was a stochastic event and not recognizing the three conditional connections between the first choice and Monty's behaviour. The cause chosen by most subjects was irrational, for example, insisting on the first choice and believing in one's intuition, not estimating correctly the probability of inherent MHD, and lacking motive for considering the problem carefully.
作者 邱江 张庆林
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期222-224,242,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家重点学科西南大学基础心理学项目资助
关键词 Monty HALL DILEMMA 心理模型 贝叶斯推理 Monty Hall Dilemma, mental model, Bayesian reasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Tubau E,Alonso D. Overcoming illusory inferences in a probabilistic counterintuitive problem: the role of explicit representations.Memory & Cognition, 2003,31(4) :596 - 607.
  • 2Johnson - Laird P N, Legrenzi P. Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 1999, 106(1) :62- 88.
  • 3Granberg D, Brown T A. The Monty Hall dilemma. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995,21:711 - 723.
  • 4Burns B D, Wieth M. The collider principle in causal reasoning: why the monty hall dihmma is so hard. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2004,133(3) :434 - 449.
  • 5Krauss S, Wang X T. The psychology of the monty hall problem:Discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 2003, 132 ( 1 ) :3 - 22.
  • 6Goldstein D G, Gigerenzer G. Models of Ecological Rationality: The Recognition Heuristic. Psychological Review, 2002,109( 1 ) :75 - 90.
  • 7Gigerenzer G. The psychology of good judgement: Frequency formats and simple algorithms. Journal of Medical Decision Making, 1996,16 : 273 - 280.
  • 8Evans B T. In two minds: dual - process accounts of reasoning.Trends in cognitive science, 2003,7 (10) :454 - 459.
  • 9Goel V, Dolan R J. Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief.Cognition, 2003,87, B11 - 1322.
  • 10Goel V. Evidence for dual neural pathways for syllogistic reasoning.Psychologia,2003, 32,301 - 309.

共引文献29

同被引文献55

  • 1傅小兰,赵晓东.信息表征形式对解决贝叶斯推理问题的影响[J].心理与行为研究,2005,3(2):109-115. 被引量:13
  • 2王宝玺,向玲,张庆林.表征影响三门问题解决的实验研究[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(4):29-34. 被引量:7
  • 3史滋福,邱江,张庆林.明确嵌套集合关系对贝叶斯推理的促进效应[J].心理学报,2006,38(6):833-840. 被引量:12
  • 4林崇德.发展心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1995..
  • 5艾森克,基恩.(2003).认知心理学(pp.516,679-792).第4版.高定国,肖晓云译.上海:华东师范大学出版社.
  • 6马西莫,皮亚里-泊尔马里尼.(2005).理性的错觉如何控制我们的思维(pp.15-137).欧阳绛译.北京:中央编译出版社.
  • 7Aaron, E., & Spivey, M. (1998). Frequency vs. probability formats: Framing the three doors problem. Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 13-18.
  • 8Burns, B. D., & Wieth, M. (2004). The collide principle in causal reasoning: Why the Monty hall dilemma is so hard. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133(3), 434-449.
  • 9Fiske, T. M., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. California: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
  • 10Franco-Watkins A., Derks, E, & Dougherty, M. (2003). Reasoning in the Monty Hall problem: Examining choice behavior and probability judgments. Thinking and Reasoning, 9 (1), 67-90.

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部