摘要
“抽象图书馆学”提出者就大家的置疑而做了回应。这些回应没有“锁定”问题,因而难以让人信服。“抽象图书馆学”招致置疑的主要原因是其内在资源建设的根基不牢,缺少哲学品位,缺乏实证研究。
Response has been made by the Initiator of Abstract Library Science to the doubt put forward by the audience. It Is difficult for the reply to be believed because it does not fix questions. The reason why Abstract Library Science has aroused suspicion lies in its unsound foundation of inner source construction, and in its lack of philosophical taste and research on concrete evidence.
出处
《图书馆建设》
北大核心
2006年第1期7-10,共4页
Library Development
关键词
抽象图书馆学
Abstract Library Science
