期刊文献+

急性脑血管病多学科一体化治疗模式对照研究 被引量:9

Research of Contrast On Systemtic Treatmeat model with Sutgects for ACVD
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究ACVD多学科一体化治疗模式对ACVD患者的疗效观察。方法建立完善的多学科一体化治疗的组织网络体系,共入选ACVD患者7202例,其中,将2000年6月至2005年6月在脑血管病治疗中心住院的ACVD患者共4089例作为治疗组(多学科一体化治疗),1995年5月至2000年5月住院的ACVD患者共3113例作为对照组(以往常规治疗法)。观察指标是神经功能缺损评分(NI HSS)、生活能力评分(BI)、牛津残障评价(OHS)、住院时间、病死率及合并症和出院后6个月残障评价。经SPSS Windows10.0统计学方法,进行分析。结果治疗组NI HSS-4.59±4.68、BI29.53±24.40、OHS-1.29±0.95对照组NI HSS-1.97±2.17、BI6.94±21.41、OHS-0.84±1.09两组比较有极显著意义(P<0.001),临床治愈率提高31.92%,平均住院日缩短8.8天,病死率降低了12.27%,并发症降低了12.52%,致残率降低了31.92%。结论多学科一体化治疗模式能提高治愈率、减少并发症、降低病死率和致残率、提高了患者的生活质量,是适合我国的ACVD的治疗模式。 Objective: To investigate the effects of systematic treatment model with subjects for ACVD patients. Methods: TO establish perfect network of Systematic Treatment model with subgerts. 7202 patients in hospital were eligible for the criteria that the patients were admitted with ACVD. Of all patients,4089 were made was treatment group from June, 2000 to June2005(Systematie Treatment model with subgerts);3113 were made as control group from June, 1995 to June, 2000 (conventional therapy). Parameters observed were at NIHSS, BI, OHS, Inhospital days, mortality, eomplieantion and six months appraise of physical disabilities at discharge. Parameters were analyged by SPPS Windows 10,0 softwere. Results: The treatment group NIHSS - 4.59 ± 4. 68, BI 29. 53 ± 24. 40, OHS - 1.29 ± 0.95 ; The control group NIHSS 1.97±2.17 ,BI 16.94±21.41 ,OHS -0.84±1.09. It were significantly different between the two groups(P〈 0. 0001. Curative rate was raised 31.92 %, morality was reducedl 2.77%, complications was reduced 12.52%, the disability was reduced 31.92 %. Conehlsion Systematic Treatment model with subjects (STMSACVD) may improve obviously curative rate, reduce complication, reduce mortality of the patients and decrease the disability, increase the life level of patients. It is a perfect treatment model that fit to our national conditions.
出处 《脑与神经疾病杂志》 2006年第1期10-12,共3页 Journal of Brain and Nervous Diseases
关键词 急性脑血管病 多学科一体化治疗模式 效果 ACVD Systematic treatment model with subjects Effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Alberts M J, Hademenos G, Latchaw RE, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers. JAMA 2000,283:3102-9.
  • 2Adams R, Acker J, Alberts M, et al. Recommendations for improving the quality of cars through stroke eenters and systems: an examination of stroke canter identification options. Stroke 2002,33:1-6.
  • 3Dennis M,Lang home P. So stroke units save lives: where do we go from here [J]? British Medical Journal, 1974,309:1273-1277.
  • 4Lang home P, Dennis M. Stroke unit:an evidence based approach[M]. BMJ Books, 1998.98.
  • 5王拥军.改变传统医疗模式,发展组织化卒中医疗体系[J].中国全科医学,2004,7(2):69-70. 被引量:29
  • 6Johnston KC, Li JY,Ly den PD, et al. Medical and Neurological Complications of ischemic Stroke:Experience From the RANTTAS Trial [J]. Stroke, 1998,29(2):447-53.
  • 7'九五'攻关课题组.急性脑卒中早期康复的研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2001,16(5):266-272. 被引量:306
  • 8Brott T, Bogousslavsky J. Treatment of acute is chemic stroke, N Engl J Med, 2000,343:710-22.
  • 9Ronning OM , Guldvog B. Stroke units versus general medical wards, Ⅰ: twelve and eighteen momlh survival:a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke, 1998,29:58-62.

二级参考文献7

  • 1程学铭 李世绰.脑血管病流行病学及人群防治[M].,1993.106.
  • 2福井 彦 王世良等(译).老年康复医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1987.44-45.
  • 3中华神经科杂志,1996年,29卷,381页
  • 4缪鸿石,脑卒中的康复评定和治疗,1996年
  • 5程学铭,脑血管病流行病学及人群防治,1993年,106页
  • 6王世良(译),老年康复医学,1987年,44页
  • 7全国第四次脑血管病学术会议.脑卒中患者临床神经功能缺损程度评分标准[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29:381-381.

共引文献332

同被引文献47

引证文献9

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部