摘要
医疗事故技术鉴定结论是处理医疗事故纠纷的重要依据,根据国务院《医疗事故处理条例》规定,对鉴定结论有异议,可要求重新鉴定和申请再次鉴定,但这两种情况存在较大的法律意义差别,同时在实践中也存在一些问题。本文从一起医疗事故鉴定引发的行政复议案出发,剖析了我国现行医疗事故鉴定制度存在的一些亟待解决的问题,并就鉴定评审制度及法律责任提出了相应的法律适用建议。
The technological expert's conclusion of malpractice is an important basis of dealing with malpractice dispute , according to the stipulations of“regulations of medical crash handling”of the State Council , object to expert's conclusion, can demand to appraise and apply to determine again , but these two kinds of situations have greater legal meaning differences again , some questions exist too in practice at the same time. This text determines from a malpractice the administration caused replies the proposal and sets out, analyze our country is it treat accident determine some to be solved problem urgently that system exist to practise medicine now, put forward the corresponding law on determining that evaluates the system and legal liability and applicable to the suggestion.
出处
《中国卫生法制》
2006年第1期40-41,共2页
China Health Law
关键词
医疗事故争议
行政复议
重新鉴定
再次鉴定
The incident of malpractice disputes
the administration reconsiders
re-appraises
once more appraises