“罪名”与“犯罪行为”之辩——对《刑法》第17条第2款的解读

Debate Between Accusal and Crime——analysis on subsection 2 of suction 17,Criminal Law

理论上和实务中对《刑法》第17条第2款的规定有不同的理解,有人认为该款规定的是八种具体犯罪的罪名,有人认为是八种犯罪行为。但是从文义解释、《刑法》第17条第2款的立法精神和规范目的、“犯罪行为说”的弊端以及“罪名说”能满足实践需要四个方面可以证明,“罪名说”的观点是正确的。应该立足成文刑法的特点,站在罪刑法定原则的立场上去理解现实中存在的值得科处刑罚却不能解释到《刑法》第17条第2款中去的行为。

There are different viewpoints about the subsection 2 of suetion 17 of Criminal Law in theory and practicing cicle . Some people think that the suction regulates eight accusals ,others think it regulates eight crime. But from the four 8.aspects： the aeccptation, the legislation spirit and the criterion motive of the suction, the malpractice of ＂Crime Theory＂, and the practical effect of judicatory practise of ＂Crime Theory＂, we can conelude that ＂Crime Theory＂is correct.