摘要
在商事仲裁中,出现有瑕疵的仲裁协议是不可避免的,特别是对仲裁机构约定不明确的情况时有发生,这是一个值得认真探讨的问题。从大多数国家的规定来看,只要使当事人通过仲裁解决他们之间的争议的最初目的得以实现,在仲裁协议或合同的仲裁条款中存在不完善或瑕疵是可以允许的。对这一问题的妥善处理应充分体现当事人意思自治原则。特别是在瑕疵仲裁协议的效力认定上,不能轻易否认其效力,尤其不能将未选定明确的仲裁机构作为认定瑕疵仲裁协议无效的条件,对此,我国《仲裁法》应作修改和完善。
In the commercial arbitration, it is inevitable for defective compromise to appear, especially withont the accurate agreement about the arbitral agency. We slould seriously discuss the problem. From the aspect of the regulations ef most countries, it is peamissible for the imperfect or fraud ef the arbitral agreement or the arbitral clause of a contract if the intimate object of the party to solve the argument by arbitration is realized. The proper solution of the problem slould reflect the principle of autonomy of the party' s will. We should not easily deny the effect of the compromise, Especially when the accurate arbitral agency is not chesen, we should not take it as the conditions of confirming the ineffectiveness of defective compromise. Thus, the arbitration law of China shonld be revised.
出处
《法学论坛》
北大核心
2006年第1期108-111,共4页
Legal Forum
关键词
商事仲裁
瑕疵
仲裁协议
有效性
commercial arbitration
fraud
compromise
effectiveness