摘要
《逍遥游》和《齐物论》两篇在庄子思想中占有重要的地位,但对两篇思想的解读仍有很多的分歧。由于《逍遥游》提出“小大之辩”,而《齐物论》主张小大齐一,对于两篇之间的关系也有不同的看法。本文从文章的论述结构切入,认为两篇同样坚持“小大之辩”的立场,遵循小大相对的论述结构,为我们展示了各种不同层次的境界和思想认识,这正是两篇共同的思想主旨。以儒家、墨家、名辩学者为代表的“人籁”和以老子、别派道家为代表的“地籁”,构成了庄子思想的背景,是与庄子之“大”相对的“小”。
FREE AND EASY WANDERING and ON SEEING THINGS AS EQUAL are two most important essays in Zhuangzi. However, it is controversial about the essential outline and the relation between them. This paper works on the structure of both essays. It is concluded that Zhuangzi compares his thought with those of other scholars at that time in these two essays, and these two essays have eommon major idea. The thoughts of Confucius, Mohist, the School of Names, Laozi, Yangist, and the Taoist in Jixia Academy are the main background of Zhuangzi's thought.
出处
《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》
2006年第1期88-92,共5页
Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
关键词
小大之辩
人籁
地籁
天籁
Distinction between Large and Small
the Pipes of Men
the Pipes of Earth
the Pipes of Nature