期刊文献+

急诊室创伤患者创伤评分与并发症和救治的关系 被引量:14

Relationship between trauma score and complications and interventions of traumatic patients in department of emergency medicine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨急诊室用创伤评分(TS)在创伤患者快速救治中的价值。方法 采用TS对1826例创伤患者进入和离开急诊室时的创伤严重程度进行评估,同时实施影像等检查和救治。结果 TS分值定为1~16分。分值越低表示伤情越重。1826例创伤患者入急诊室时。TS分值10分以上占73.06%,10分以下(包括10分)占26.94%;离开急诊室时,TS分值10分以上占91.84%.TS分值10分以下(包括10分)占8.16%;两者比较差异均有显著性(P均〈0.001)。TS分值越低,在诊治过程中低血压、休克等严重并发症发生率越高。液体需要量与TS分值有明显相关性,TS分值越低,液体需要量越大。结论 TS使用简便快速,能较好地反映损伤严重程度和伤情,对急诊室医生及早掌握病情,尽快完成急诊接诊程序和救冶很有价值。 Objective To investigate the relationship between trauma score (TS) and complications and interventional strategies in trauma patients in the Emergency Department. Methods The injury severity was assessed with TS, and eomp]ieations were recorded in 1 82% trauma patients in Emergency Department. The interventions, monitoring and imaging examinations were initiated promptly. Results The TS ranged from 1 to 16 points, and the lower the TS the poorer the patient's condition. The patients with score of 10 or above accounted for 73.06% of patients, those wilb score of 10 or below accounted for 26.94%. When they left Emergency Department in 91.84% of the patients TS was above 10, while 8. 16% of them TS was 10 or below (both P〈0. 001). The patients with score of 10 or below had a higher rate of severe complications including hypotention, shock, abnormal respiralion, and cardiac arrest. The lower the TS, the larger the amount of fluid resuscitation required. Conclusion TS provides an Objective wdue to indicate the seriousness of the patient's condition, and it is valuable in the attending to plan the strategies of intervention, raonitoring and necessary instrnmental examinations.
作者 孙俊 江学成
出处 《中国危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期36-38,共3页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基金 江苏省教委资助课题(02KJD320029)
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Champion H R,Sacco W J,Carnazzo A J,et al.Trauma score[J].Crit Care Med,1981,9:672.
  • 2Craft T M,Upton P M,Martz D G.Key topics in anesthesia[M].St Louis:Mosby-Year Book,Inc.,1995:249.
  • 3江学成 胡宁利.创伤评分工具集中文版软件[J].中国危重病急救医学,2000,12(8):453-453.
  • 4Sanaia A,Moore F A,Moore E E,et al.Multiple organ failure can be predicted as early as 12 hours after injury[J].J Trauma,1998,45:291.
  • 5江学成.创伤严重程度评分工具演变发展及其临床应用[J].中国危重病急救医学,2001,13(2):69-72. 被引量:25
  • 6江学成.关于危重疾病评分的答疑[J].中国危重病急救医学,2003,15(4):197-199. 被引量:19
  • 7胡宁利,江学成.4种创伤评分法在颅脑外伤中的评估价值[J].中国危重病急救医学,2003,15(4):237-238. 被引量:11
  • 8Boyd C K,Tolson M A,Copes W S.Evaluating trauma care:the TRISS method[J].J Trauma,1987,27:370.
  • 9Capone A C,Safar P,Stezoskiw W,et al.Improved outcome with fluid restriction in treatment of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock[J].J Am Coll Surg,1995,180:49.
  • 10Leppanlemt A,Soltero R,Burris D,et al.Fluid resuscitation in a model of uncontrolled hemorrhage:too much too early,or too little to late[J]?J Surg Res,1996,63:413.

二级参考文献7

共引文献52

同被引文献114

引证文献14

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部