期刊文献+

情境缺场到情境敏感——确证悖论研究的进展与启示

From Situation-absent to Situation-sensitive—The Development and Inspiration of Confirmation Paradoxes Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 确证悖论是一个重大的逻辑哲学和科学哲学问题,围绕着它主要有三类解决方案被提了出来。这三类方案之间有内在的逻辑-历史关联,它们是逐层发展的,并实现了从情境缺场到情境迟钝的转向。确证悖论研究历史和最新成果向我们启示:确证悖论的良好解悖方案应该是情境敏感型的,确证悖论的研究将实现第二次转向,即从情境迟钝转向情境敏感。 Confirmation paredox is an important problem in philosophy of logic and philosophy of science. Many solutions have been proposed, and they fall into three approaches. There is an inner logical- historical connection among the three approaches. That is to say, the three approaches have developed step by step and they have turned from situation - absent to situation - insensitive. The last fruits and the history of confirmation paradoxes research inspire us that a good solution to confirmation paradoxes should be situation - sensitive, which means the research on confirmation paradoxes will realize the second turn——from situation- insensitive to situation- sensitive.
作者 顿新国
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期28-31,54,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金项目"当代西方逻辑哲学最新成就研究"(项目编号03BZX043) 教育部人文社会科学研究重点研究基地重大项目"逻辑哲学重大问题研究"(项目编号05ZZD720.40002)的阶段性成果之一
关键词 确证悖论 相干性方案 贝耶斯型方案 情境迟钝 confirmation paradoxes relevance solutions Bayesian solutions situation-insensitive
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Carl G Hempel. Studies in the Logic of Confirmation [J]. Mind, 1945,Vol. LIV. 14,15-18,18-19.
  • 2P R Wilson. On the Confirmation Paradox [J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1964, Vol. xv. 197.
  • 3Judith Schoenherg. Confirmation by Observation and the Paradox of the Ravens [J]. The British Joarnal for the Philosophy of Science,1964, Vol. xv (59): 202.
  • 4H G Alexander. The Paradox of Confirmation-A Reply to Dr Agassi[J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,1959, Vol.X(39), 231.
  • 5C A Hooker, D Stove. Relevance and the Ravens[J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1967 (18): 309,311-314.
  • 6J L Mackie. The Paradox of Confirmation [J] . The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1963, Vol.XIII(52):273.
  • 7Branden Fitelson. The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Prohlem of Measure Sensitivity[J]. Philosophy of Science, 1999(66):S362.
  • 8Peter B M Vrenas. Hempel's Raven Paradox: A Lacuna in the Standard Bayesian Solution[J]. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Issue: 2004(55); 547-550.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部