摘要
确证悖论是一个重大的逻辑哲学和科学哲学问题,围绕着它主要有三类解决方案被提了出来。这三类方案之间有内在的逻辑-历史关联,它们是逐层发展的,并实现了从情境缺场到情境迟钝的转向。确证悖论研究历史和最新成果向我们启示:确证悖论的良好解悖方案应该是情境敏感型的,确证悖论的研究将实现第二次转向,即从情境迟钝转向情境敏感。
Confirmation paredox is an important problem in philosophy of logic and philosophy of science. Many solutions have been proposed, and they fall into three approaches. There is an inner logical- historical connection among the three approaches. That is to say, the three approaches have developed step by step and they have turned from situation - absent to situation - insensitive. The last fruits and the history of confirmation paradoxes research inspire us that a good solution to confirmation paradoxes should be situation - sensitive, which means the research on confirmation paradoxes will realize the second turn——from situation- insensitive to situation- sensitive.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第2期28-31,54,共5页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
国家社科基金项目"当代西方逻辑哲学最新成就研究"(项目编号03BZX043)
教育部人文社会科学研究重点研究基地重大项目"逻辑哲学重大问题研究"(项目编号05ZZD720.40002)的阶段性成果之一
关键词
确证悖论
相干性方案
贝耶斯型方案
情境迟钝
confirmation paradoxes
relevance solutions
Bayesian solutions
situation-insensitive