期刊文献+

可疑巨大儿处理的成本效益分析

Treatment of suspected fetal macrosomia: A cost-effectiveness analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Treatment of fetal macrosomia presents challenges to practitioners because a potential outcome of shoulder dystocia with permanent brachial plexus injury is costly both to families and to society. Practitioner options include labor induction, elective cesarean delivery, or expectant treatment. We performed a cost-effective analysis to evaluate the treatment strategies that were preferred to prevent the most permanent brachial plexus injuries with the least amount of dollars spent. Study design: Using decision analysis techniques, we compared 3 strategies for an infant with an estimated fetal weight of 4500 g: labor induction, elective cesarean delivery, and expectant treatment. The following baseline assumptions were made: Probability of shoulder dystocia in vaginal delivery, .145; labor induction, .03; cesarean delivery, .001; probability of plexus injury, .18; probability of permanent injury, .067; probability of cesarean delivery with induction, .35; with expectant treatment, .33; cost of vaginal delivery, $ 3376; cost of elective cesarean delivery, $ 5200; cost of cesarean delivery with labor, $ 6500; lifetime cost of brachial plexus injury, $ 1,000,000. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Under baseline assumptions for an infant who weighs 4500 g, expectant treatment is the preferred strategy at a cost of $ 4014.33 per injury-free child, compared with elective cesarean delivery at a cost of $ 5212.06 and an induction cost of $ 5165.08. Sensitivity analyses revealed that, if the incidence of shoulder dystocia and permanent injury remained < 10% , expectant treatment is the preferred method. Conclusion: Fetal macrosomia with possible permanent plexus injuries is a concern. Our analysis would suggest that expectant treatment is the most cost-effective approach to this problem. Objective: Treatment of fetal macrosomia presents challenges to practitioners because a potential outcome of shoulder dystocia with permanent brachial plexus injury is costly both to families and to society. Practitioner options include labor induction, elective cesarean delivery, or expectant treatment. We performed a cost-effective analysis to evaluate the treatment strategies that were preferred to prevent the most permanent brachial plexus injuries with the least amount of dollars spent. Study design: Using decision analysis techniques, we compared 3 strategies for an infant with an estimated fetal weight of 4500 g: labor induction, elective cesarean delivery, and expectant treatment. The following baseline assumptions were made: Probability of shoulder dystocia in vaginal delivery, . 145; labor induction, . 03; cesarean delivery, . 001; probability of plexus injury, . 18; probability of permanent injury, . 067; probability of cesarean delivery with induction, . 35; with expectant treatment, . 33; cost of vaginal delivery, $3376; cost of elective cesarean delivery, $5200; cost of cesarean delivery with labor, $6500; lifetime cost of brachial plexus injury, $1, 000, 000.
机构地区 Dr. M.A. Herbst 不详
出处 《世界核心医学期刊文摘(妇产科学分册)》 2006年第1期14-15,共2页 Core Journal in Obstetrics/Gynecology
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部