期刊文献+

三种不同重睑术式术后效果比较 被引量:7

The comparison of three different double-fold eyelid shape taking operations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察不同双重睑术式手术后效果比较。方法:回顾性研究本院1999年以来,门诊行双重睑手术患者94例,根据手术方式,分为甲、乙、丙3组。甲组采用皮肤睑板固定法,乙组采用皮肤埋藏缝线法,丙组采用简易缝线结扎加压法。上述每组每例的随访时间均>1a。结果:甲组18例中有1例双重睑左右重睑沟稍有不对称,行二次手术。1例术后2mo内有轻度上眼睑外翻,保守治疗后消失。乙组24例中1例双重睑皱褶术后6mo后稍有变浅,2例可见闭眼后轻度皮下结节。丙组52例中1例术后7mo双重睑线稍有变浅。结论:简易缝线结扎加压法为双重睑手术首选的安全、可靠方法之一。 AIM: To observe the different effects of different dou- ble-fold eyelid shape taking operation. METHODS: The results of 94 cases of double eyelid operation from January 1999 to June 2004 were retrieved, All the cases were divided into three groups according to the different double-fold eyelid shape taking operations: skin-eyelid fastness, buried suture and simple suture ligation, The follow-up periods were more than 1a. RESULTS: There was significant difference (P〈0.05)on the rates of postoperative complications among the three groups. CONCLUSION: The simple suture ligation method is a safe, effective and credible procedure for double-fold eyelid shape taking operation.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2005年第6期1269-1270,共2页 International Eye Science
关键词 双重睑手术 皮肤睑板固定法 皮肤埋藏缝线法 缝线结扎加压法 double-fold eyelid shape taking operation skin-eyelid fastness buried suture simple suture ligation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献1

同被引文献41

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部