期刊文献+

墨西哥随机盲法复检抗酸杆菌涂片新的外部质量评价指南实验项目结果报告

Evaluation of new external quality assessment guidelines involving random blinded rechecking of acid-fast bacilli smears in a pilot project setting in Mexico
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地点:实施国家结核病控制规划中的抗酸菌镜检外部质量保证的墨西哥实验室。包括对本地实验室报告的 100%抗酸菌阳性涂片和 10%阴性涂片的复检。在墨西哥使用非随机和非盲法重检时很少发现错误。目的:对墨西哥两个州的当地结核病实验室一年的实验项目抗酸菌痰涂片随机盲法重检结果进行评价,决定这种方法在以后实施的可行性。设计:为减少误差,来自流行病学诊断与参比研究所国家结核病实验室(InDRE)的工作人员对每个州的当地实验室抗酸菌涂片进行每季度一次的统计学抽样及现场评价。抗酸菌涂片复检在本州的实验室进行,如遇结果不符时上交 InDRE 解决。结果:对抗酸菌涂片进行随机盲法复检比非随机、非盲法重检时发现错误的概率大得多。结论:随机盲法重检可以更加准确地估计抗酸菌涂片镜检的结果,提高诊断及对治疗效果的监测。
出处 《结核与肺部疾病杂志》 2005年第4期158-161,共4页 Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Fujiki A,Giango C,Endo S.Quality control of sputum smear examination in Cebu Province[].International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.2002
  • 2Hadgu A.The discrepancy in discrepant analysis[].The Lancet.1996
  • 3Van Deun A.External quality assessment of sputum smear microscopy: a matter of careful technique and organization[].International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.2003
  • 4Rieder H L,Chonde T M,Myking H,et al.The public health service national tuberculosis reference laboratory and the national laboratory network[]..1998
  • 5Martinez-Guarneros A,Balandrano-Campos S,Ridderhof J,et al.Implementation of proficiency testing in conjunction with a rechecking system for external quality assurance in tuberculosis laboratories in Mexico[].International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.2003
  • 6Lipman H B,Astles J R.Quantifying the bias associated with the use of discrepant analysis[].Clinical Chemistry.1998
  • 7Van Deun A,Roorda F A,Chambugonj N,et al.Reproducibil ity of sputum smears examination for acid-fast bacilli: practical problems met during cross checking[].International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.1999
  • 8de Kantor I N,Laszlo A,Vazquez L,et al.More on periphery to centre quality control of sputum smear microscopy and ’rapid fading’ of Ziehl-Neelscn staining[].International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.2001
  • 9Miller W C.Bias in discrepant analysis: when two wrongs don’t make a right[].Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.1998
  • 10Nguyen T N L,Wells C D,Binkin N J,et al.The importance of quality control of sputum smear microscopy: the effect of reading errors on treatment decisions and outcomes[].International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.1999

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部