期刊文献+

Offering Adequate Pedagogical Progression via Mobile Equipments——Experiment of a French Engineering School

Offering Adequate Pedagogical Progression via Mobile Equipments——Experiment of a French Engineering School
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Students may enter our 5-year engineering school in France at two levels; first and third year. However, due to their quite different backgrounds (this is especially true for third year students) , we need to provide newcomers with a 6-week training period during which they follow classes in the fields where they particularly feel weak. Unfortunately, depending on the student' s background, this is not always possible to bring him/her to the expected level. Another aspect one needs to mention is that these students may not have the same weaknesses in a given field. However, for economical reasons, those classes follow a uniform program as it is not feasible to provide a customised progression. In this paper we discuss how to redesign a mathematics course so as to offer tailored exercise sequencing. Groups of 20 students could then draw their exercises from an intranet database according to their previously completed work, try to solve it by themselves, request additional hints and even ask for some direct help from the teacher. Such a database is currently under development. If it turns out several students stumble against the same difficulty the teacher could show the whole class room how to solve it using the digital projector. This project goes one step further than our initial mobile education project (2003 - 2004 ). Until recently, we had used the equipment in a unique direction, from the instructor toward the students. Here, in this new project we are focusing on the whole loop in order to offer a more adequate (personalized) pedagogical progression ; from the student to the teacher (when the tablet PCs are monitored by the teacher) , and back toward the students (when a direct help is provided by the teacher). Students may enter our 5-year engineering school in France at two levels : first and third year. However, due to their quite different backgrounds ( this is especially true for third year students ), we need to provide newcomers with a 6-week training period during which they follow classes in the fields where they particularly feel weak. Unfortunately, depending on the student's background, this is not always possible to bring him/her to the expected level. Another aspect one needs to mention is that these students may not have the same weaknesses in a given field. However, for economical reasons, those classes follow a uniform program as it is not feasible to provide a customized progression. In this paper we discuss how to redesign a mathematics course so as to offer tailored exercise sequencing. Groups of 20 students could then draw their exercises from an intranet database according to their previously completed work, try to solve it by themselves, request additional hints and even ask for some direct help from the teacher. Such a database is currently under development. If it turns out several students stumble against the same difficulty the teacher could show the whole class room how to solve it using the digital projector. This project goes one step further than our initial mobile education project ( 2003 - 2004 ). Until recently, we had used the equipment in a unique direction, from the instructor toward the students. Here, in this new project we are focusing on the whole loop in order to offer a more adequate (personalized) pedagogical progression : from the student to the teacher (when the tablet PCs are monitored by the teacher), and back toward the students (when a direct help is provided by the teacher).
出处 《开放教育研究》 CSSCI 2006年第1期59-62,共4页 Open Education Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1Applefield, J.M, Huber, R, & Moallem, M.(2001).‘Constructivism in Theory and Practice: Towards a Better Understanding', High School Journal, 84 (2) 19-35.
  • 2Bates, A.W.(1995).Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education, Routledge, London.
  • 3Bates, A.W.(2004).‘Technology and Lifelong Learning: Myths and Realities', in Distance Education and Technology: Issues and Practice eds, D.Murphy, R.Carr, J.Taylor, & W.Tat-meng, The Open University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong.
  • 4Cheng, K.(2004).Questioning Education Learning and Society in a Post-Industrial Era, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • 5Chow, L.and Siaw, I.(2003).‘Evaluating the use of Online Discussion Boards at The Open University of Hong Kong', in The 17th Asian Association of Open University Conference, Thailand.
  • 6Cryer, P.& Okorocha,E.(1999).‘Avoiding Potential Pitfalls in the Supervision of NESB Students', in Supervising Postgraduates from Non-English Speaking Backgrounds, eds.Y.Ryan, & O.Zuber-Skerritt, The Society for research in Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham.
  • 7Falchikov, N.(2001).Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education, Routledge Falmer, London.
  • 8Fung, Y.Y.H.(2004).‘Collaborative Online Learning: Interaction Patterns and Limiting Factors', Open Learning, 19 (2), 135-149.
  • 9Islam, M.K.(2003).‘A Case Study of Student Participation in Discussion in an Online Higher Education Course, unpublished Ph.D.thesis, Victoria University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
  • 10Islam, M.K.& Vale, C.(2005a).The Teacher's Role in Promoting Online Peer Group Learning, in ‘ The 3rd Conference on Research in Distance and Adult Learning in Asia and the 4th Conference on Distance Education in China', 22-22 June, The Open University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部