“罪名”与“犯罪行为”之辩——对刑法第十七条第二款的解读

Debate Between Accusal and Crime -Analysis on Subsection 2 of Section 17, Criminal Law

理论上和实务中对刑法第十七条第二款的规定有不同的理解。但是从文义解释、刑法第十七条第二款的立法精神和规范目的、“犯罪行为说”的弊端以及“罪名说”能满足实践需要四个方面能够证明:“罪名说”的观点是正确的。应该站在成文刑法的特点和罪刑法定原则的立场上去理解现实存在的值得科处刑罚却不能解释进刑法第十七条第二款中去的行为。

There are different viewpoints about the subsection 2 of section 17 of Criminal Law in theory and practicing cicle. Some people think that the section regulates eight accusals, others think it regulates eight crime. But from the four aspects：the acceptation, the legislation spirit and the criterion motive of the section, the malpractice of＂Crime Theory＂ ,and the practical effect of judicatory practise of＂Crime Theory＂, we can conclude that＂Crime Theory＂is correct. The understanding about the phenomena that some crimes are not involved in criminal law should be based on the characteristic of statute law and ＂nullum crimen nulla poena sine lege＂.