期刊文献+

面向复杂决策任务的综合集成决策研讨总体框架设计 被引量:17

Design the Overall Framework of Metasynthetic Engineering for Argumentation towards Complex Decision Tasks
原文传递
导出
摘要 从群体决策任务结构化理论出发,分析了复杂决策任务研讨过程的层次结构和组合机理,结合从定性到定量的综合集成方法,研究提出了一种适合软件实施需求,能够充分实现人机结合的研讨信息分解集成框架,在此基础上设计实现了一种可付诸于实施的研讨厅系统———开放式群体决策研讨平台GASS,并给出一个企业开拓新市场的决策实例. The complexity and uncertainty of complex decision tasks bring a big limit to information catching, comprehension, and application for individuals in group discussion and decision - making. The development of modem network information technologies has enabled decision - making group to take full use of computer to make fast and highly efficient decisions. In this paper, we analyzed the hierarchy and combination mechanism of complex decision tasks process based on structurization theory. Combined with the study on metasynthetic methodologies from qualification to quantification, we brought up an information analysis and integration frame which is capable to not only meet the requirements of software application, but also fully realize human-PC communication. Based on this frame, we designed an applicable HWMSE system - group argumentation support system.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期9-17,41,共10页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金重大项目(79990580)
关键词 复杂决策任务 群体决策支持系统 综合集成研讨厅体系 决策研讨总体框架 complex decision tasks group decision support system metasynthetic engineering overall framework for argumentation of decision
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Gerardine DeSanctis,R.Brent Gallupe.A foundation for the study of group decision support systems[J].Management Science,1987,33(5):589-609.
  • 2Carey J M,Kacmar C J.The impact of communication mode and task complexity on small group performance and member satisfaction[J].Computers in Human Behavior,1997,13 (1):23-49.
  • 3Qian Xue-sen,Yu Jing-yuan,Dai Ru-wei.A new scientific field-opening complex huge system and the methodology[J].Nature Magazine,1990,13(1):3-10.
  • 4于景元,涂元季.从定性到定量综合集成方法——案例研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,22(5):1-7. 被引量:99
  • 5Poole,Marshall Scott,Holmes,Michael.Group decision support systems and group communication[J].Communication Research,1993,20(2):176.
  • 6Zigurs,Ilze,Buckland,Bonnie K.A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness[J].MIS Quarterly,1998,22(3):313-335.
  • 7Sillince,John A,Masoud H,Saeedi.Computer-mediated communication:problems and potentials of argumentation support systems[J].Decision Support Systems,1999,26(4):287-306.
  • 8Tung X.Bui,Francois Bodart.ARBAS:A formal language to support argmnentation in network-based organizations[J].Journal of Management Information Systems,1997,14(3):223-237.
  • 9Winterfeldt D V,Edwards W.Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research[M].Cambridge Universitypress,1986:90-136.
  • 10Brodie C B,Hayes C C.DAISY:a decision support design methodology for complex,experience-centered domains[C].IEEE Transactions on Systems,Man,and Cybernetics-Part A:Systems and Humans,2002,32(1):50-71.

二级参考文献18

  • 1程少川,王刊良,席酉民.基于行为的思维分析和DSS中信息组织方式的研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1995,15(11):25-30. 被引量:7
  • 2Bui T X 席西民(译).群体决策支持系统[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1992..
  • 3王寿云 顾基发.国防系统分析的综合集成-挑战、机遇、对策.复杂巨系统理论·方法·应用[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1994.33-41.
  • 4汪浩 汪浩 等.综合集成研讨厅的分析与组织机构模型.系统方法论及应用[M].长沙:《系统工程》编辑部,1996.42-45.
  • 5王寿云 科学家传记大辞典编辑组.钱学森.中国现代科学院传记[M].北京:科学出版社,1991..
  • 6Gallagher R 戴汝为 等.超越还原论.复杂性研究论文集[M].,1999..
  • 7于景元 史若华 等.财政补贴、价格、工资综合研究[M].航天工业部710所,1984..
  • 8[1]Carey J M, Kacmar C J. The impact of communication mode and task complexity on s mall group performance and member satisfaction[J]? Computers in Human Behavior ,1997,13 (1): 23-49
  • 9[2]Rescher N. Dialectics: a controversy-oriented approach to the theory of know ledge[M]. Albany:State University of New York Press,1977
  • 10[3]Geffner H,Pearl J. Conditional entailment:bridging two approaches to default reasoning[J]. Artificial Intelligence,1992,53(2-3):209-244

共引文献152

同被引文献170

引证文献17

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部