摘要
目的了解高原军人自测健康状况与个性的关系。方法采用随机整群抽样法,选择驻西藏某部队官兵464名,应用自测健康评定量表和艾森克个性问卷进行调查。结果不同性格倾向和情绪稳定度的高原军人的自测健康状况得分不同,其中,内向性格者(6.45±1.06)分,中间性格者(7.02±0.96)分,外向性格者(7.49±1.00)分,情绪稳定者(7.71±1.08)分,情绪中间者(7.28±0.87)分,情绪不稳定者(6.51±0.94)分,外向性格者除生理健康以外,其心理健康、社会健康以及自测健康得分较中间及内向性格者的为高,情绪稳定者的自测健康水平显著高于情绪不稳定者(P<0.001);高原军人的自测健康状况得分与EPQ内外向维度呈显著的正相关、与神经质维度呈显著的负相关。结论高原军人的个性特征对其自测健康状况有显著影响,积极调控情绪,培养乐观外向的性格人助于提高其自测健康状况。
Objective To investigate the status of the self-rated health of,military personnel in high altitude area. Methods Using random sampling method, 464 military personnel in Tibet were assessed with self-rated health Measurement Scale and Eysenek Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). Results The military personnel in high ahilude area have different self-rated health scores who have different personality tendentiousness and stable emotion levels . Therefore, their scores as following : introverted personality 6.45±1.06, middle personality 7.02±0.96, extroverted personality 7.49±1.00, stable emotions 7.71±.08, middle emotions 7.28± 0.87, unstable emotions 6.51±0.94. Additionally, extroverted personality, in addition to being physically healthy, their mental health, social health, and self-rated health scores are also higher than introverted personalities. Mentally stable personality' s self-rated score is also higher than mentally unstable personality ( P 〈 0. 001 ). There was a significant positive correlation between the EPQ score of introversion-extroversion and the self-rated health score. There was also a significant negative correlation between the score of neuroticism and the self-rated health score. Conclusion High altitude military personnel' s personality significantly 'affects their self-rated health. To improve their self-rated health, they need to cultivate an optimistic outlook as well as control their emotions;this will also increase their health standard.
出处
《中国行为医学科学》
CSCD
2006年第2期147-148,共2页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
关键词
高原军人
自测健康
个性
横断面研究
High altitude military personnel
Self-rated health
Personality
Cross-sectional studies