期刊文献+

波动的福利成本研究述评 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 1985年,卢卡斯在芬兰赫尔辛基所做的一次学术演讲中首次提出了波动福利成本问题(演讲稿于1987年出版),他以美国相关数据为依据,认为波动成本几乎是可以忽略的。很快就有人提出反驳意见。从此有关波动成本的争论就持续不断,时至今日仍无定论。显然,波动福利成本对于经济周期(经济波动)和宏观政策都有着十分重要的意义。因此本文讨论这一方面的研究状况。
出处 《经济学动态》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期89-93,共5页 Economic Perspectives
基金 本文为上海市哲学和社会科学研究课题:“随机冲击与中国的经济波动”阶段性成果.
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Alvarez, F. & J. Jermann (2004), "Using asset prices to measure the cost of business cycles". Journal of Political Economy, 112(6):1223-1256.
  • 2Atkeson, A. & P.Christopher (1994), "Reconsidering the costs of business cycle with incomplete markets", in S. Fischer & J. Rotemberg (ed.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 3Barlevy, G. (2004), "The cost of business cycles under endogenous growth", American Economic Review 94(4):964-990.
  • 4Beaudry, P. & P. Carmen (2001), "The cost of business cycles and the stabilization value of unemployment insurance", European Economic Review 45(8): 1545-1572.
  • 5Delong & Summers (1988), "How does macroeconomic policy affect output", Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 433-480.
  • 6Dolmas, J. (1998), "Risk preferences and the welfare cost of business cycles", Review of Economic Dynamics 1(3):646-676.
  • 7Epaulard, A. & A.Pommeret (2003), "Recursive utility, growth, and the welfare cost of volatility", Review of Economic Dynamics 6(2):672-684.
  • 8Imrohoroglu, A. (1989), "Cost of business cycles with indivisibilities and liquidity constraints", Journal of Political Economy 97 (6): 1364-1383.
  • 9Krusell, P. & A.Smith (1999), "On the welfare effects on eliminating business cycles", Review of Economic Dynamics 2(1):245-272.
  • 10Krusell, P. & A.Smith (2002), "Revisiting the welfare, effects on eliminating business cycles", Rochester University Working Paper, Nov.

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部