期刊文献+

几种酶制剂在稻谷浓缩料型生长猪肥育日粮中的使用效果 被引量:4

Effects of Several Enzyme Preparations on Rice-concentrate Diet in Growing-finishing Pigs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以南方普遍使用的浓缩料为对象,研究酶制剂对浓缩料-稻谷型日粮使用效果的影响。选择20kg左右的长×大杂交去势小猪90头,分为5个处理组,即玉米日粮组(A组)、稻谷日粮组(B组)、稻谷日粮+9302组(C组)、稻谷日粮+2327组(D组)、稻谷日粮+欧帝酶组(E组),每个处理3个重复(栏),每个重复6头。所有试验组日增重和料肉比均差于玉米日粮组,A、D、E组日增重差异不显著(P>0.05),且均显著好于B、C组(P<0.05)。5个组料肉比差异不显著(P>0.05)。各组总能消化率均低于玉米组,其中不加酶的稻谷组显著低于其他组(P<0.05),其他组间差异不显著(P>0.05)。E组和A组蛋白质消化率显著高于其他组(P<0.05),其中稻谷不加酶(B组)蛋白质消化率极显著低于其他组(P<0.01)。A、C、D、E组大肠杆菌数量显著低于B组(P<0.05)。D组的乳酸杆菌数量显著高于其他组(P<0.05)。A、C、D、E组双歧杆菌数量显著高于B组(P<0.05)。 Based on concentrate prevailing in south China, effects of several enzyme preparations on concentrate-rice-diet in growing pigs was studied in this experiment. 90 L×Y hybrid pigs about 20 kg were selected to be divided into 5 diet groups with treatments in random respectively. The DG and FCR of all other treatments were worse than group A with group A, D, E not differring significantly(P〉0.05) but better than B, C(P〈0.05). FCR of all groups did not differ significantly. GE digestibilities of other diet groups were lower than treatment A with B being lower than A,C, D, E remarkably(P〈 0.05) which had not significant difference(P 〉 0.05). Protein digestibilities of diet A, E were better than others signifieantly(P〈0.05) with diet B lower than others significantly(P〈0.01). Escheriehia Coli in group A, C, D, E were lower than B significantly(P〈0.05). Lactic bacteria in group D was more than others(P〈 0.05). Bifidobacterium in group A, C, D, E were more than B significantly(P〈0.05).
作者 晏和平
出处 《饲料博览》 2006年第1期1-5,共5页 Feed Review
关键词 酶制剂 稻谷浓缩料 生长猪 生产性能 营养物质消化能 粪便微生物 enzyme preparations rice-concentrat growing pigs performance nutritient-digestibility feces-microorganism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献54

  • 1张石蕊 田科雄 等.糙米与玉米饲粮对肉猪饲用价值比较研究.迈向新世纪[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1998.14-18.
  • 2韩友文.饲料和饲养学[M].北京:农业出版社,1993..
  • 3汤玮如 黄美华 等.国产稻谷、碎米的生产概况及饲料营养价值评定.中国动物营养研究进展.中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届学术讨论会论文集[M].天津:天津科技翻译出版公司,1992.12-18.
  • 4Ahlemeyer B, Junker V, Huhne R, et al. Brain Res, 2001,890 (2): 338~342.
  • 5Chiu AE, Lane AT, Kimball AB. J Am Acad Dermatol,2002, 46 (1): 145~146.
  • 6Grange AS. Age Ageing, 2001, 30 (6): 523~525.
  • 7Benjamin J, Muir T, Briggs K, et al. Postgrad Med J, 2001,77 (904): 112~113.
  • 8McKenna DJ, Jones K, Hughes K. Altern Ther Health Med,2001, 7 (5): 70~86.
  • 9Curtis-Prior P, Vere D, Fray P, et al. J Pharm Pharmacol,1999, 51 (5): 535~541.
  • 10Bridi R, Crossetti FP, Steffen VM, et al. Phytother Res,2001, 15 (5): 449~451.

共引文献113

同被引文献64

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部