期刊文献+

中国上市公司两职设置与公司治理绩效关系的实证分析 被引量:10

An Empirical Study of the Selection of Corporate Leadership'Structure of Chinese Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 合理的上市公司领导权结构对于提高上市公司的监督与决策效率至关重要。以代理理论以及资源依赖理论为理论依据,在对中国上市公司治理状况调查的基础上,对有可能决定公司领导权结构的因素进行了系统的实证分析。在充分考虑公司治理机制替代作用的基础上,建立两职设置指数模型。实证结果表明我国上市公司在选择领导权结构时充分考虑了环境稳定性以及董事会规模等因素;大股东性质不同的上市公司两职设置有较大差异;法人股股东的控制能力越高,两职分离的程度越高。我国上市公司股权结构的不合理,降低了财务杠杆的监督效应。研究结果的政策含义是上市公司董事长与总经理两职分设还是兼任不能一概而论,而应充分考虑上市公司自身的特点而定,同时应进一步调整上市公司不合理的股权结构,以充分发挥财务杠杆的监督作用。 A reasonable structure of corporate leadership is very important for the improvement of the efficiency of an organization's monitoring and decision-making. This study is an attempt to investigate, with in the framework of agency theory and resource-dependence theory, the factors that may help to determine the corporate leadership structure in a Chinese listed companies. The results indicate Chinese listed companies take into account the environmental changes and scale of directorates when they choose the structure of corporate leadership. Great difference of leadership structure exists among different big shareholders: the higher the capability of corporation control, the greater the extent of separation between board chairman and CEO. But there is no substitution for the function of corporate governance mechanism. The implications for policy-making is that we should take into account the condition of different corporations and do not force every company to adapt themselves to one mode of leadership structure. Further optimizing the structure of corporate share should be taken for the sake of improving the efficiency of monitoring of Chinese listed companies.
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期115-124,共10页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70272026) 山东省软科学项目(A200428-5) 济南市科委项目(041082-2)。
关键词 两职设置指数 资源丰度 财务绩效 治理机制 实证分析 index of corporate leadership structure abundances of resource financial performance corporate governance mechanism empirical study
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献19

  • 1高闯.经理行为的显示、激励与监控理论述评[J].社会科学辑刊,1998(6):75-81. 被引量:5
  • 2.《中华人民共和国公司法》[Z].,1994年7月1日起施行,1999年12月25日修改..
  • 3尤金·法马,迈克尔·詹森(1983),《所有权与控制权的分离》,《所有权、控制权与激励——代理经济学文选》,陈郁编,上海人民出版社,1996年。
  • 4Chagantl, R.S., V. Mahajan and S. Sharma, 1985, Corporate Borad Size, Composition and Corporate Failures in Retalling Industry, Journal of Management Studies, Vol.22, P400-417.
  • 5Baliga, B. R., R. C. Moyer and R. S. Rao, 1996, CEO Duality and Firm Performance: What's the Fuss? Strategic Management Jourbal, Vol. 17, P41-53.
  • 6Boyd Brian K. 1995, CEO Duality and Firm Performance: A Contingency Model, [J]. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, P301-312.
  • 7Boyd Brian K. 1990, Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environments: A Test of the Resource Dependence Model, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 11, P419-430.
  • 8Finkelstein, S., R.A. D'Aenl, 1994, CEO Duality as a Double-edged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unlty of Command, Academy of Management Journal, October, P1078-1108.
  • 9Rechner Pauia L; Dan R. Dalton, 1991, CEO Duality and organizational Performanoe:A Longitudinal Analysis, Strategic Management Journal Vol. 12, P155-160.
  • 10Donaldson, L., J.H. Davis, 1991, Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 16, P49-64.

共引文献384

同被引文献164

引证文献10

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部