“观察/实验负载理论”论题批判

The Criticizing about Thesis "Theory Ladenness of Observation/Experiment"

新实验主义和科学实践哲学对“观察/实验负载理论”命题的批判观点和策略是:反对强化理论的观点;说明存在无理论负载的实验和观察;观察的所有报告不必然负载一个科学理论;某些实验更不必诉诸高层次理论,反而可能激励理论产生。这并不构成向实证主义的回归,而正在构成新的实践优位的科学实践哲学研究进路;给出对观察/实验与理论各种复杂关系的一个初步分析,观察/实验的确与理论的关系在不同阶段、有不同的特征和变化,不同品格的观察/实验与理论有不同的关系;不能以一个普遍的命题勾勒它们之间的关系。

The critical views and critical strategies about thesis of ＂theory laden＂ from the new exr perimentalism and philosophy of scientific practices： argue against to views of strong theory dominating observations / experiments; explain there are some observations and experiments are theory-free; any observed reports may not must lade the scientific theories; some experiments can not more appeal to theory in higher but may inspire to bring theory. This do not make of regressions toward to positivism, but forming a new approach for composing practice-dominance philosophy of science, and this paper giving to a original analysis of some complex different relations between observations / experiments and theories in different phases, levels and evolvements, if it included with a universal principle it would be error, this is a our conclusion too.