闽台建设用地变化与工业化耦合的对比分析

A comparative research of coupled construction land change and industrialization between Fujian and Taiwan provinces

闽台因其区域自然背景及历史文化的相似性和经济发展时序递差性成为区域对比研究的理想对象之一。利用闽台相关统计资料对比显示,闽台建设用地增长速度均体现出加速发展的态势,并集中分布于台湾海峡两岸,与两岸的经济布局成东西呼应格局。从福建不同工业化区域以及台湾工业化阶段对比,闽台建设用地综合变动系数均经历了由工业化初期的稳定型或相对稳定型发展到工业化中期的剧变型,并于工业化后期步入缓变型的过程,但福建工业化初期及后期的综合变动系数值略低于台湾。相关指标对比研究结果显示:相对于台湾而言福建产业结构变动率快于建设用地变化率,但福建工业化中期及后期区域的建设用地效率还明显低于台湾。通径分析的结果说明闽台建设用地变化的差异与两地经济发展阶段及产业结构密切相关。文章最后提出福建建设用地实现可持续利用的发展对策。

Comparative study of LUCC between Fujian and Taiwan could be a good case for study because of their geographical proximities and historical, cultural similarities. Fujian and Taiwan had gone through and were in different economic development phases. Taiwan is in the stage of post-industrialization and Fujian is in the middle stage of industrialization. By using the official statistics, changes of construction land in Fujian and Taiwan were analyzed. The results showed that these two provinces seemed to have the same characteristics of constructionland changes, i.e., accelerating development, and concentrated distribution on both sides of the Taiwan Straits, forming a pattern with the economic layout of two sides acting in cooperation with each other. From the contrast of different industrialized areas in Fujian with Taiwan industrialized stages, it is clear that these two provinces seemed to have the same characteristics of synthesized index of construction land change （Lc）, i. e., from stabilization or comparative stabilization at the initial stages of industrialization to high expansion at the middle stages of industrialization, then followed by low expansion at later stages of industrialization, but the Lc of the initial and the later stages of industrialization in Taiwan was slightly higher than that in Fujian. Relevant indexes are compared with the result of the study and shown： The industrial structure change rate of Fujian is faster than that of the construction land in Taiwan, but the construction land efficiency of the area is also obviously lower than Taiwan in the middle and later stages of industrialization in Fujian. The major driving forces of the constructionland changes in both provinces were analyzed in Causal Models of Path Analysis, the result indicates that the difference in construction land change of the two provinces is closely related to their economic development stage and industrial structure. Countermeasure for the realization of sustainable utilization of construction land in Fujian put forward in this article is to strengthen intension and tap the latent power.