期刊文献+

让语言自身言说——从语言的角度看阿多诺的现代主义美学及其政治意义 被引量:2

Let Language Speak Itself: Adorno’s Modernist Aesthetics and Its political Significance Seen from the Perspective of Language
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代主义的哲学假设与美学实践颠覆了传统再现说,突出了语言与形式的核心地位。阿多诺以其独特的“语言言说”理论使马克思主义文论成功地面对了这一新的挑战。他的理论指出现代主义最精美的作品以其不谐和的形式反映了社会宰制对人类与自然本身造成的苦难,也暗示了对结束宰制的要求以及替代性的社会关系。因此,阿多诺的理论与批评实践极大地丰富和发展了马克思主义文学批评的传统。 Modernist philosophical assumption and aesthetic practice have undermined the traditional theory of representation and highlighted the core position of language and form. Adorno, with his unique theory of “language that speaks,” makes Marxist literary theory successfully face this new challenge. He points out that the finest modernist works, with their inharmonious form, reflect the suffering that the social rules inflict upon human beings and nature itself. Meanwhile, they also indicate a strong demand for the end of these rules and for an alternative social relation as well. It is in this way that Adorno’s theory and critical practice greatly enrich and develop the Marxist tradition of literary criticism.
作者 凌海衡
出处 《文艺研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期41-45,共5页 Literature & Art Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Alice R. Kaminsky, "On Literary Realism", in John Halperin (ed.), The Theory of the Novel, London. Oxford University Press, p. 217.
  • 2安敏成.《现实主义的限制》[M].江苏人民出版社,2001年.第126页.
  • 3Frank Kermode, History and Value , Oxford. Clarendon, 1988, p. 99.
  • 4Gyorgy Lukacs, "Realism in the Balance"(1938), in E. Bloch et al., Aesthetics and Politics , London.NLB, 1977, pp. 36-37.
  • 5Martin Heidegeer, Unterwegs zur Sprache ( Pfullingen .Neske, 1959), SS. 32-33.
  • 6Adorno, " Charmed Language . On the Poetry of Rudolf Borchardt",in Notes to Literature, vol. 2, trans. Shierry Weber Nicholsen, New York. Columbia University Press, 1991-2, p. 193, pp. 193-94.
  • 7Foucault, "A Preface to Transgression," Language,Couater-Memory Practice, Blackwell, Oxford, 1977,pp. 41-2.
  • 8Adorno, "Eichendorff',Notes to Literature, vol. 2, p.69.
  • 9Martin Jay," Mimesis and Mimetology", from Tom Huhn and Lambert Zuidervaart, ( eds. ), Tin, Semblance of Subjectivity . Essays in Adorno's Aesthetic Theory, Cambridge, Mass. . MIT Press, 1997, pp. 31-32.
  • 10Adorno, Aesthetic Theory, ed. and trans. Gretel Adorno and Rolf Tiedemann Robert Hullot-Kentor, Minneapolis. University of Minnesota Press, 1997, p. 111, p. 169, p. 54, p. 430, p. 16, p. 289, p. 237, p. 279.

同被引文献12

  • 1Theodor.W. Adorno, Notes to Literature(volume one),p.31.
  • 2Theodor.W. Adomo, Aesthetic Theory, Editors. ,Gretel Adorno and Rolf Tiedemann, trans., Robert Hullot- Kentor,London: The Athlone Press,1997,p.208.
  • 3Theodor.W. Adorno , Aesthetic Theory, pp.127-128.
  • 4Theodor.W. Adorno, Notes to Literature(volume two),p. 158.
  • 5T'heodor.W. Adorno,Aesthetic Theory, p.573.
  • 6Theodor.W. Adorno, Notes to Literature (volume two), pp.93-94.
  • 7Theodor.W. Adorno,Notes to Literature (volume one), trans.,Shierry Weber Nicholson,New York: Columbia University Press, 1991, p.64.
  • 8Theodor.W. Adorno, Notes to Literature(volume one),p.65.
  • 9Theodor.W. Adorno, Notes to Literature (volume two ) ,p. 157.
  • 10Theodor.W. Adorno, Notes to Literature (volume two ) ,p. 156.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部