期刊文献+

3.5—5.5岁儿童在知觉相似与概念冲突情形下的归纳推理 被引量:21

3.5 - 5.5 Years Older' s Inductive Reasoning in Similarity vs Conception Confliction Condition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探讨儿童是基于知觉相似还是基于概念进行归纳推理,利用儿童较为熟悉的材料,设计知觉相似与概念冲突的情形,并在4种不同的信息提示条件下,测试了总共275名3.5岁、4.5岁和5.5岁儿童的归纳推理。实验结果显示,在预备实验中,3.5岁的儿童已经能够排除无关刺激要么基于知觉相似要么基于概念进行归纳推理,但二者没有显著差异;在正式实验中,在4种任务条件下,3.5岁的儿童的情况基本与预备实验相同,而4.5岁和5.5岁的儿童则更倾向于基于概念进行归纳推理,这表明儿童的归纳推理经历了从依据知觉相似到依据概念关系的转变,但发生转变的年龄应该不是在7~8岁,而是在4岁半之前。 Total 275 children aged in 37- 71 months had been tested their inductive reasoning in a similarity-conception confliction condition in four different hinted information task. The firstly condition was that aimed stimulus had no same audition information with selected stimulus; the secondly condition was that aimed stimulus had the same perceptual symbol with one of selected stimulus ; the third condition was that aimed stimulus had the same conceptual symbol with one of selected stimulus; the fourth condition was that aimed stimulus had the same perceptual symbol with one of selected stimulus and had the same conceptual symbol with another selected stimulus. The results showed that no significant difference on basedsimilarity and based-conceptlon in inductive reasoning in 3.5 years old children in four condition, and 4.5 and 5.5 years old children can base on conception in their inductive reasoning in four condition. The results also showed that children may have a gradual transition from similarity-based to category-based induction, but the age of transition may occur before 4.5, not before 7 - 8 years old.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期47-55,共9页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 本研究是国家自然科学基金项目(30370488) 西南大学基础心理学国家级重点学科重点项目(西国重04006) 中国科学院重要方向项目(KSCX2-SW-221)的部分工作
关键词 知觉相似 概念 儿童 归纳推理 similarity, conception, child, inductive reasoning.
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1李红,陈安涛,冯廷勇,李富洪,龙长权.个体归纳推理能力的发展及其机制研究展望[J].心理科学,2004,27(6):1457-1459. 被引量:30
  • 2Mandler J M, McDonough L. Drinking and driving don' t mix: inductive generalization in infancy, Cognition, 1996, 59:307 - 335.
  • 3Mandler J M, McDonough L. Studies in inductive inference in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 1998,37:60 - 96.
  • 4Welder A, Graham S A. The influences of shape similarity and shared labels on infants inductive inferences about noaobvious object properties. Child Development,2001,72:1653 - 1673.
  • 5Graham S A, Kilbreath C S, Welder A N. Thirteen - month - olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences.Child Development, 2004, 75 (2) :409 - 427.
  • 6龙长权,吴睿明,李红,陈安涛,冯廷勇,李富洪.对以类别为基础的归纳推理的几种理论模型的评价[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(5):596-605. 被引量:7
  • 7陈安涛,李红,冯廷勇,高雪梅,张仲明,李富洪,杨东.分段设计条件下归纳推理的多样性效应[J].中国科学(C辑),2005,35(3):275-283. 被引量:14
  • 8Gelman S A. Psychological essentialism in children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004, 8 (9) :404 - 409.
  • 9Gelman S A, Markman E M. Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 1986,23 : 183 - 209.
  • 10Gelman S A, Markman E M. Young childreng inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. Child development, 1987,58 : 1532 - 1541.

二级参考文献112

共引文献64

同被引文献314

引证文献21

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部