期刊文献+

溃坝后果严重程度评价模型研究 被引量:50

Study on evaluation models of severity degree of dam failure impact
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了建立溃坝严重程度综合评价的定量模型,依据现行法规,采用建立数学模型的方法,分别分析并提出了决定大坝溃决后果严重性的3个主要影响因子(生命损失、经济损失和社会环境影响)的严重程度系数及其对数非线性和对数线性评价模型,构造了溃坝后果严重程度的综合评价模型。依据该模型,定量分析了5座水库大坝溃坝的严重性,给出了判别严重程度的定量指标。 Dam risk assessment technique has already been used in the field of dam safety management abroad especially in Canada, Australia and USA in receut twenty years. There are more than 85 000 darns in China and about one-third of them are with severe deficiency and in high risks. Therefore it is real necessary to use this kind of technique to assist prioritiziug darn maintenance or rehabilitation, reducing risks caused by dam failure. The technique consists of two important research objectives, dam-break probability analysis and dam failure impact evaluation. Dam failure impact includes three main factors: loss of life, financial loss, society and environment. How to evaluate the severity degree by means of these three factors comprehensively is a challenge of dam rehabilitation declsion-making. The paper is to present a comprehensive evaluation coefficient for dam-break severity degree. The study introduces integrative assessment function L which considered weights St respectively of llfe loss, financial loss, society and environment, and their severity coefficients Fi , formed as linear weighted sum method. In order to integrate loss of life, financial loss, society and environment in accordance with existing laws and regulations in China, logarithm non-linear or linear models of data normalization are established to deal with their different units, A series of quantitative values of L which divide disaster event into deferent degree are suggested according to Chinese situatial. The method and evaluation model is practically applied at 5 reservoir dams to appraise their severity degrec of failure impact respectively and the comparison of these results are made to decide which one is more severe. The analyzed result shows that hazard of all these 5 dams would be extreme severe and should report to State Council as soon as the event of dam break occur.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 2006年第1期1-4,共4页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 科技部社会公益研究专项基金项目(2002DIA30017)
关键词 水利管理 大坝风险 溃坝后果 严重程度 评价模型 water conservancy dam risk dam tailure impact severity evaluation models
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1ANCOLD. Guideline on risk assessment [ M]. Sydney: Australian National Committee on Large Dams, 2003.
  • 2The Heinz Center. Dam removal science and decision making [ M ],Washington D, C. : The H John Heinz Ⅲ Center for Science, Economic and Environment, 2002.
  • 3徐玖平,胡知能,王逶.运筹学[M].Beijing:Science Press,2004.
  • 4王仁钟,李雷,盛金保.水库大坝的社会与环境风险标准研究[J].安全与环境学报,2006,6(1):8-11. 被引量:50
  • 5王仁钟 李雷 盛金保 etal.病险水库除险加固排序示范应用研究报告[R].Nanjing:Naming Hydraulic Research Institnte,2005..

二级参考文献9

  • 1彭雪辉,李雷,王仁钟.大坝风险分析及其在沙河集水库大坝的应用[J].水利水运工程学报,2004(4):21-25. 被引量:10
  • 2王仁钟,李雷,盛金保.病险水库风险判别标准体系研究[J].水利水电科技进展,2005,25(5):5-8. 被引量:29
  • 3ANCOLD ( Australia National Committee on Large Dams). Guideline on risk assessment [S]. 2003.
  • 4HARTFORDDND LOUJK.Risk assessment for dam safety[C]..大坝安全监测国际会议论文集[C].Beijing:China Book Press,1998.157-161.
  • 5盛金保 彭雪辉.Study on risk critertion of Chinese reservoir dams[C]..中国水利学会首届青年科技论坛文集[C].Beijing:China WaterPower Press,2004.476-480.
  • 6HSE ( Health and Safety Execute, United Kingdom). The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations [R]. Her Majesty' s Stationary Office,London, 1988.
  • 7BALL D J, FLOYD P J. Societal risks [R]. Paper prepared for UK Health and Safety Execute, 1998.
  • 8李雷 彭雪辉 王昭升.水库大坝溃决模式和溃坝概率分析研究[R].Nanjing:Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute,2004..
  • 9王仁钟 李雷 盛金保 etal.病险水库除险加固排序应用示范总结报告[R].Nanjing:Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute,2005..

共引文献52

同被引文献403

引证文献50

二级引证文献364

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部