期刊文献+

认识与再认识:论哈姆雷特的认知能力(英文) 被引量:1

Cognition and Recognition: Hamlet’s Power of Knowledge
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《哈姆雷特》可谓莎士比亚最具哲理的戏剧。在这一作品中,莎士比亚探讨了形式多样的人类认知方式及其与能力的关系。他在哈姆雷特这一人物身上构建的理智与能力的关系昭示着现代认知话语并为之提供了种种范式。本文着重考察哈姆雷特的认知过程并探究其在现代认识史中的作用。哈姆雷特的心智能力和实际行为之间存在差异,这使他成了个认知之谜,犹如身心不一的人面狮身怪兽斯芬克斯。继哈姆雷特之后的现代和后现代人同样面临着这一身心分离的窘境和认识自我的无望。 In his most philosophical drama, Hamlet, Shakespeare explores various modes of human knowledge and its relations with power. His configuration of the relationship between intellectuality and power in the characterization of Hamlet anticipates, and provides models for, modem discourses of knowledge. This study examines the protagonist' s cognitive process and investigates his role in modem epistemological history. The disparity between Hamlet' s mental ability and his physical action makes him a cognitive riddle which rivals that of Sphinx, whose head is incongruent with its body. His modem and postmodem heirs share this dilemma of mind-body separation and the frustration of knowing themselves.
作者 杨林贵
出处 《外国文学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期16-23,共8页 Foreign Literature Studies
关键词 哈姆雷特 认识与再认识 身心分离 Hamlet (re-) cognition mind-body disparity
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Burke, especially 7-18.
  • 2For a discussion of the debate and of how the opposing parties configure the good/evil effects of theatrical transactions, see Armstrong 216-18.
  • 3Freud and Jones.
  • 4Recent Shakespearean studies have incorporated findings of cognitive research and cultural philosophy. Mary Crane studies how culture and body work together to form Shakespeare' s early modern subjects in Shakespeare' s Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory. Especially, Ellen Spolsky' s book Satisfying Skepticism: Embodied Knowledge in the Early Modern World, to which I am greatly indebted for this study, provides penchant showcases of early modern skepticism and their implications in Shakespeare' s plays, particularly Coriolanus and Othello. Spolsky suggests that in the early modern period, versions of skepticism "the entanglements of brain, body, and culture-were felt by some to be a sickening disappointment" (4).
  • 5Armstrong, Philip. "Watching Hamlet Watching: Lacan, Shakespeare, and the Mirror/Stage. " Alternative Shakespeares 2. Ed. Terence Hawkes. London: Routledge, 1996. 216-37.
  • 6Burke, Peter. Montaigne. New York: Oxford UP, 1981.
  • 7Chames, Linda. "The Hamlet Formerly Known as Prince." Grady 189-210.
  • 8Clark, Andy. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge: MIT P, 1997.
  • 9Crane, Mary. Shakespeare's Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2001.
  • 10D' Amico, Jack. Knowledge and Power in the Renaissance. Washington, DC : UP of America, 1977.

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部