诉讼时效的理论基础:有待破解的法律之谜——诉讼时效基本理论的反思与我国诉讼时效立法的重新选择(一)

The Foundation of Theory of Limitation of Action:A Riddle to be Exposed——The review of fundamental theory about limitation of action and our new choice when we revise the law(part one)

我国近现代继受民法诉讼时效制度时,没有发生如同西方激烈的伦理争议,理所当然地以“效率”和“有利查清案件事实”作为诉讼时效理论基础全盘加以接受。民法学界对于诉讼时效理论基础的解释,混淆了诉讼时效和取得时效的差别,抹杀了实体立法与程序立法的目的,颠倒了权利与利益之间的因果关系,无论在功利分析还是逻辑实证方面都不成立。必须跳出既有的理论领域,寻找诉讼时效的理论基础之谜。

Limitation of action didn＇t arouse the vigorous moral dispute as it had done in the west when we received civil law in our country. We take it for granted that ＂effieiency＂and ＂facts of a case to be clear ＂is the theory of foundation of limitation of action. The present doctrine about foundation of limitation of action confuses the difference between usucapio and limitation,and makes substantial law as adjective law, reverses the place between right as cause and benefit as result. The present doctrine is wrong in analysis of the utility and logical demonstration. We must come out the current theory province, find out the answer to limitation.