期刊文献+

注册会计师独立审计的博弈分析 被引量:7

Game Theoretical Analysis of Independent Audit of CPA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前我国注册会计师的独立审计服务质量不高已是一个不争的事实,文章认为作为一个理性的经济人注册会计师之所以未能提供高质量的审计服务与其所面临的审计执业环境有关。注册会计师独立审计在多方参与人之间进行着博弈,在不同的执业环境下形成不同的博弈支付矩阵,注册会计师会选择自己的最优策略,最终影响到审计质量。为此,要改变注册会计师的策略行为使其选择如实出具审计意见的诚信行为,需要改变注册会计师在与独立审计多方参与人之间进行的博弈矩阵支付。文章分析了三个最重要的方面:不同注册会计师之间的博弈;注册会计师与企业管理当局之间的博弈。注册会计师与监管当局之间的博弈。并根据分析的结果提出相应的建议。 It is an indisputable fact that the service of independent audit of CPA is generally in low quantity. This paper thinks that as a rational economist, CPAs' failure to offer high quantity audit serviceis attributed to their profession environments. CPAs are in games with many counterparts, which results in different game matrix payoffs in different circumstances. CPAs will choose their own optimal strategy that will determinate the quantity of independent audit finally. So if we want CPAs to offer faithful audit conclusion, we need remodel the payoffs in game matrix resulted from the interactions of CPAs and their counterparts to change their strategy. This paper analyses the most important three games: the games between different CPAs, CPAs and managements of enterprises, CPAs and regulating-authorities, then based on that it gives corresponding suggestions.
作者 许辉
出处 《华东经济管理》 2006年第2期140-143,共4页 East China Economic Management
关键词 注册会计师 独立审计 博弈支付 诚信 CPA independent audit payoff in game matrix good faith
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1沈林,王鹏.我国证券市场中介机构的信息披露作用研究[J].贵州商业高等专科学校学报,2003,16(4):8-10. 被引量:3
  • 2Balvers,R J., Bill McDonald and Robert E. Miller, 1988, Un-derpricing of New Issues and the Choice of Auditor as a Signal of Investment Banker Reputation, Journal of Accounting Re-search, 63 : 605-622.
  • 3Brian W. Wayhew, 2001, Auditor Reputation Building, Journal of Accounting Research, 39: 599-618.
  • 4Bull C., 1987, The Existence of Self-Enforcing Implicit Con-tracts, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102 : 147-159.
  • 5Craswell,A. T. ,Jere R. Francis and Stephen L. Taylor, 1995,Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations,Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20: 297-322.
  • 6DeAngelo.L.Angelo, L. , 1981, Auditor independence, ' low halling', and disclosure regulation, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3.113-127.
  • 7Randolph P. Bcatty, 1989, Auditor Reputation and the Pricing of Initial Public Offerings, The Accounting Review, 64: 693-709.
  • 8Satip Bandyopahyay and Jennifer L. Kao, 2001, Competition and Big 6 Brand Name Reputation. Evidence from the Ontario Mu-nicipal Audit Market, Contemporary. Accounting Research, 18:27-64.
  • 9Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman, 1983, Agency Problems, Audit-ing and the Theory of the Firm:Some Evidence,Journal of Law and Economics, 26 : 613-633.
  • 10Wilson. T. E. Jr, and R. A. Grimlund, 1990, An Examination of the Importance of an Auditor's Reputation, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9: 43-59.

共引文献559

同被引文献20

引证文献7

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部