摘要
刚性的“要件一效果”模式,易导致个案的非正义。私法效果的弹性化,可透过要件的动态化而实现。合意与否、错误与否的判断,需在信赖合理性与归责性比较权衡的基础上透过合同解释来完成。合同解释为要件的动态化提供了场域。合同解释中,通过信赖合理性和归责性要件动态化的比较权衡,可分别得出:不合意且无责任、不合意同时承担缔约过失责任、合意且有错误而可撤销、合意虽有错误但不可撤销等结论,从而实现法律效果的弹性化。
The rigid "requirements-effects" mode sometimes leads to injustice in given cases. The flexibility of legal effects in private law could be realized by the dynamic requirements. The judgment of whether there is a meeting of minds or whether there is a mistake shall be reached by interpretation of contract on the basis of comparing and weighing the reasonableness of reliance and zurechenbarkeito The interpretation of contract provides a space for the dynamic requirements. By the dynamic process of rea- sonableness of reliance and zurechenbarkeit in contract interpretation, comparing and weighing, various conclusions could be reached including non meeting of minds and no liability, non - meeting of minds and pre - contract liability, meeting of minds with mistakes and revocable, and meeting of minds without mistake and irrevocable. Such are the realization of the flexibility of legal effects.
出处
《法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第1期104-113,共10页
Chinese Journal of Law
关键词
要件的动态化
不合意
错误
合同解释
弹性化
dynamic requirements, non -meeting of minds, mistake, interpretation of contract, flexibility