期刊文献+

发展中国家金融发展战略的演变——国际经验和理论视角

Evolution of Financial Development Policies in Developing Countries
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着发展中国家经济发展观的转变,“华盛顿共识”逐步演变为“后华盛顿共识”。“后华盛顿共识”强调金融领域甚至是经济领域以外的因素。从一个国家自身的利益出发,金融市场是否具有效率优势,最终的评判标准是能否动员国内储蓄并促进国内的资本形成。开放经济中,这种效率优势应该是在与其他国家的对比中所体现出来的优势。这不是传统理论中的政府与市场机制效率的比较,而是一国内部市场因素与非市场因素结合以后,与其他国家所进行的效率比较。由此,在金融发展战略中强调市场与政府的互补关系,就是很自然的事。 The author observes that Washington agreement has gradually evolved to post-Washington agreement which emphasizes factors outside the financial system, even outside the economic system. The ultimate criterion for judging whether the financial market maintains advantages in efficiency is whether it leads to increasing savings and capital at home. In an open economy this advantage is reflected by the resuits of comparison with other countries. To he more specific, it refers to comparison of efficiency by examining both the market aspects and non-market aspects within a country with the equivalent aspects in other countries. Therefore, in the financial development it is natural to emphasize the complementary relation between the government and the market.
作者 于春海 雷达
出处 《教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期43-48,共6页 Teaching and Research
基金 教育部优秀青年教师项目"利率非均衡和发展中国家金融自由化评析"(项目批准号为12201100) 中国人民大学"211"项目的资助
关键词 发展中国家 金融发展战略 华盛顿共识 后华盛顿共识 developing countries strategies for financial development the Washington agreement post-Washington agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Williamson,J.Did the Washington Consensus Fail[J].Institute for International Economies,November 6,2002.
  • 2Williamson,J.What Should the Bank Think about the Washington Consensus[Z].Paper Presented at the World Bank's PREM Meetings,July 1999.
  • 3Moises Naim.Washington Consensus or Washington Confusion[J].Foreign Policy Magazine,October 26,1999
  • 4雷达,黄卫平.东亚国家外部均衡的特征与金融自由化[J].中国人民大学学报,2002,16(1):67-73. 被引量:1
  • 5James D.Wolfensohn.A Proposal for a Comprehensive Development Framework[Z].www.worldbank.org,January 21,1999.
  • 6Geert Bekaet,Campbell R.Harvey,and Christian Lundland.Does Financial Liberalization Spur Growth[J].National Bureau of Economic Research,April 2001.
  • 7John Williamson.Latin American Adjustment:How Much Has Happened[M].Washington DC..Institute for International Economics,1990.
  • 8Romer,P.M.Increasing Returns and LongRun Growth[J].Journal of Political Economy,Vol.94(5),1986.
  • 9Williamson John.An Agenda for Restarting Growth and Reform[A].in After the Washington Consensus [C].Institute for International Economics,2003.
  • 10Stiglitz Joseph.Challenging the Washington Consensus[J].The Brown Journal of World Affairs,Vol.IX,Issue 2,7 May 2002.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Jongmoo Jay Choi. The Asian Financial Crisis:Moral Hazard In More Ways than One[A]. Asian Financial Crisis Financial Structural And International Dimensions[C]. edited by J.Jay Choi. JAI An Imprint of Elsevier Science, 2000.
  • 2Eichenggreen, Barry. Toward A New International Financial Architecture A Practical Post-Asia Agenda[M]. Institute for International Economics, 1999.
  • 3Frank J. &Franco Modigliani. Capital Market[M]. Prentic Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Nersey, 1992.
  • 4Tobin, James. Financial Globelization[A]. World Development Vol.28, No.6, 2000. 1101 - 1104.
  • 5Lee, Phil Sang and Kyung Suh Park. Origins And Poticy Implications of Then Asian Financial Crisis[A].Asian Financial Crisis-Financial, Structural and International Dimensions[C].
  • 6Patrick and Park. The Financial Development of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan [M]. Oxford University Press,1994.
  • 7T.J. Pempel. The Politics of the Asian Economic Crisis[M]. Cornell University Press,1999.
  • 8Calvo, Guillermo and Morns Goldstein. What Role for the Official Sector? [M]. Institute for International Economics, 1996.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部