期刊文献+

国际商事仲裁中一般法律原则在可仲裁性问题上的适用 被引量:1

The Application of General Principles of Law to Arbitrability in International Commercial Arbitration
原文传递
导出
摘要 争议的可仲裁性系国际商事仲裁领域的一项基本问题,仲裁员依据什么法律来界定争议的可仲裁性是仲裁程序能否启动的前提。从国际商事仲裁的理论与实践来看,在可仲裁性问题上适用仲裁地法、当事人合意选择的法律以及仲裁裁决的被请求承认与执行地法,均存在着这样或那样的问题。本文作者认为,仲裁员应适用一般法律原则作为衡量争议可仲裁性问题的准据法,因为这类原则已为不同国家的法律制度所承认,并且其适用符合整个国际社会的共同利益,提高了跨国商事争议解决的效率和可预见性。 The issue of arbitrability is a most basic one in international commercial arbitration. It is the prerequisite for arbitrators to commence arbitration by referring the law to determine arbitrability. There are some methods in the theory and practice of international commercial arbitration for determining the applicable law to arbitrability, such as applying the law of the country where the tribunal is seated, the law of the parties' choice, the law of the country where will most likely be enforced. However, all these methods disadvantages. In author's opinion, arbitrators should apply general principles of law as applicable law when determining arbitrability, because this kind of principles are recognized by a number of legal systems, and serve the interests of the international community in the efficiency and predictability of dispute resolution in transnational commerce.
作者 张潇剑
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《外交评论(外交学院学报)》 CSSCI 2006年第1期101-105,共5页 Foreign Affairs Review
关键词 国际商事仲裁 一般法律原则 可仲裁性 适用 international commercial arbitration general principles of law arbitrability
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Award in ICC Case No. 1803 (1972), reprinted in 5 Y.B.Com. Arb. 1980.177,180.
  • 2Award in ICC Case No. 6379 (1990), reprinted in 17 Y.B.Com. Arb, 1992,212,215.
  • 3Award in ICC Case No. 4604(1984), reprinted in 112 J. du droit int'l 1985,973,975.
  • 4Award in ICC Case No. 6162 (1990), reprinted in 17 Y.B.Com. Arb. 1992.153,158.
  • 5Award in ICC Case No. 6752 (1991), reprinted in 18 Y.B. Com. Arb. 1993.54, 55-56.
  • 6see also Bernard Hanotiau. What Law Governs the Issue of Arbitrability? [J]. 12 Arb. Int'l 1996.391,399.
  • 7Pierre Mayer. Mandatory Rules of Law in international Arbitration [J]. 2 Arb. Int'l 1986.
  • 8Karl-Heinz Bumockstiegel. Public Policy and Arbitrability,in Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration IJl. 1CCA Congress Series No.3, 1987.
  • 9Framatome et al. v. Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Interim Award in ICE Case No. 3896 (1982), reprinted in 8Y.B. Com. Arb. 1983.94.
  • 10see also George R. Delaume.Comparative Analysis as a Basis of Law in State Contracts:The Myth of the Lex Mercatoria [J]. 63 Tul. L. Rev.1989.575, 596.

共引文献1

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部