期刊文献+

支板布局对三维侧压式进气道特性的影响 被引量:6

Effect of strut configuration on 3-D sidewall compression scramjet inlet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对采用前掠、后掠及混合掠支板布局的三维侧压式超燃发动机进气道(工作马赫数4~6)开展了数值计算,详细比较了不同支板布局的流场波系、边界层发展以及总体性能特征,主要结论有:(1)后掠支板进气道的起动马赫数范围较宽,但附加溢流大,需前移唇口保证流量系数,结果上顶板反射激波加强,总压损失和流场畸变较大;(2)前掠支板进气道能保证较高的流量系数及总压恢复系数,但低马赫数起动困难;(3)混掠支板进气道综合了前掠与后掠布局的优点,能够保证较宽马赫数范围内的工作和较优的进气道性能,但需优化。 Three kinds of sidewall compression scramjet inlets with aft, forward and Aft-Forward strut-sweeping configuration were numerically investigated. These scramjet inlets were operated in Mach number 4 -6. The flow fields, shock wave structure, turbulence boundary layer development and overall performance characteristics of different scramjet inlet configuration were analyzed. It is concluded that: ( 1 ) Aft strut-sweeplng inlet can possess wide operation Mach number range with small inner contraction ratio and the large spillage. Upstream displacement of inlet lip can reduce the spillage rate but lead to stronger reflecting shock on the top wall, which increases total pressure loss and flow distortion at the inlet exit ; (2) Forward strut-sweeping inlet can ensure large mass flow rate coefficient and total pressure recovering factor, but is difficult to start at low roach number; (3) the aft-forward strut-sweeping inlet, inheriting both advantages of Aft and Forward strut-sweeping inlets, can have a more favorable performance than solely Aft or Forward strut-sweeping inlets, which can be further enhanced by adjustments of forward/aft strut position, cowl shape and compressing angle as well as shock wave structure.
出处 《推进技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期52-57,共6页 Journal of Propulsion Technology
关键词 超音速进气道 支板 前掠 后掠 混合掠 Supersonic inlet Strut Aft sweep Forward sweep Aft-forward sweep
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献36

  • 1梁德旺,王可.AUSM+格式的改进[J].空气动力学学报,2004,22(4):404-409. 被引量:25
  • 2Smart M K. Optimization of Two-dimensional Scramnjet Inlets [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1999, 36(2):430-433.
  • 3Safarik P, Polak A. Optimal Shock Wave Parametres for Supersonic Inlets [J]. Joumal of Propulsion and Power, 1996, 12( 1 ):202- 205.
  • 4Kergaravat Y, Vives E, Knight D. Inlet/Body Integration Preliminary Design for Supersonic Air-breathing Missiles Using Automated Multi-disciplinary Optimization [R]. ADA386248,1998.
  • 5Ebrahimi H B, Mohanraj R, Merkle C L. Multilevel Analysis of Pulsed Detonation Engines [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power,2002, 18(2) :225-232.
  • 6Malan P, Brown E F. Inlet Drag Prediction for Aircraft Conceptual Design [J]. Joumal of Aircraft, 1994, 31(3):616-622.
  • 7Yoou S, Jameson A. Lower-upper Symmetric-Gauss-Seidel Method for the Euler and Navier-Stocks Equations [J]. AIAA Journal, 1988, 26(9).
  • 8Fonseca C M, Fleming P J. Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Formulation, Discussion and Generalization [R]. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Ceneti Algorithms, 1993:416- 423.
  • 9Hutchison M G, Unger E, Mason WH, Grossman B, Haftka R T. Variable-complexity Aerodynamic Optimization of a High Speed Civil Transport Wing [J]. Journal of Aircraft,1994, 31(1) :110- 116.
  • 10[1]Trexler C A.Inlet Performance of the Integrated Langley Scramjet Module[R].AIAA 75-1212.

共引文献108

同被引文献68

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部