期刊文献+

非糜烂性反流病食管黏膜超微结构研究 被引量:16

Ultrastructural investigation in esophageal mucosa of non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨非糜烂性反流病(NERD)病理性酸反流组及生理性酸反流组,其食管黏膜细胞间隙及桥粒数目等超微结构的变化情况。方法对10例健康志愿者(对照组)、39例NERD患者及10例反流性食管炎(RE)患者进行内镜检查并作食管黏膜活检,透射电镜观察标本。图像分析仪测量食管黏膜细胞间隙宽度,同时统计相应间隙中的桥粒数目。结果RE组及NERD组的细胞间隙宽度分别为(2.39±0.42)μm及(2.21±0.68)μm,两组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。对照组细胞间隙宽度为(0.63±0.21)μm,明显小于RE组及NERD组(P〈0.05)。NERD病理性酸反流组及生理性酸反流组的细胞间隙宽度分别为(2.45±0.67)μm及(1.91±0.67)μm,两组间差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。RE组及NERD组的桥粒数目均数分别为(0.124±0.044)个/μm2及(0.141±0.043)个/μm2,两组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但均少于对照组[(0.221±0.031)个/μm2],P〈0.05。NERD病理性酸反流组的桥粒数目[(0.110±0.032)个/μm2]明显少于生理性酸反流组[(0.171±0.028)个/μm2]。结论NERD组的细胞间隙明显宽于正常对照组,但与RE组无明显差别。NERD病理性酸反流组的细胞间隙明显宽于生理性酸反流组;细胞间隙间的桥粒数目也可能是酸诱导的细胞损伤标志。 Objective To explore the changes of uhrastructural characteristics including interstitial space dilation (ISD) and the number of desmosome in non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) with abnormal and normal oesophageal acid exposure. Methods Nineteen patients with abnormal oesophageal acid exposure, 20 with normal oesophageal acid exposure, 10 with reflux esophagitis (RE) and 10 asymptomatic controls, classified on the basis of pH-metry, underwent endoscopy. Three biopsies were taken from the normal mucosa for light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy evaluation. ISD was measured and the number of desmosome in the intercellular spaces was calculated by using a digital scanner from photomicrographs of the specimens. The above two markers were compared with each other among the above groups. Results There was no significant difference in the mean score of the interstitial space between NERD and RE patients [ (2. 21 ± 0.68)μm versus (2.39±0.42)μm, P〉0.05)]. The mean score of the interstitial space of the control was (0.63 ±0.21)μm, much lower than those of NERD and RE patients (P〈0.01). There was a significant difference in ISD between NERD with abnormal oesophageal acid exposure and normal oesophageal acid exposure [(2.45±0.67)0644m versus (1.91±0. 67)μm, P〈0.05]. The mean numbers of desmosome in the intercellular space of the NERD and RE patients were (0. 141 ± 0. 043) entries/μm^2 and (0. 124 ±0. 044) entries/μm^2, respectively, significantly lower than those of the controls [(0. 221 ±0.031) entries/μm^2. But no significant differences were observed between the RE and the NERD patients (P〉 0. 05). Conclusions The interstitial space of esophageal mucosa in the NERD patients is dilated as in the RE. In NERD patients, the dilation of interstitial space is associated with abnormal acid exposure. The numbers of desmosome may also be a marker of esophageal mucosal injury of NERD.
出处 《中华消化杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期18-21,共4页 Chinese Journal of Digestion
关键词 非糜烂性反流病 超微结构 细胞间隙增宽 Non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease Ultrastructure Interstitial space dilation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Locke GR 3rd,Talley NJ,Fett SL,et al.Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux:A population-based study in Olmsted Country,Minnesota.Gastroenterology,1997,112:1448-1456.
  • 2Goh KL.Changing epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the Asian-Pacific region:an overview.J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2004,19(Suppl 3):S22-S25.
  • 3Carney CN,Orlando RC,Powell DW,et al.Morphologic alterations in early acid induced epithelial injury of the rabbit esophagus.Lab Invest,1981,45:198-207.
  • 4中国胃食管反流病研究协作组.反流性疾病问卷在胃食管反流病诊断中的价值[J].中华消化杂志,2003,23(11):651-654. 被引量:471
  • 5Calabrese L,Fabbri A,Bortolotti M,et al.Dilated intercellular spaces as a marker of oesophageal damage:comparative results in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with or without bile reflux.Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2003,18:525-532.
  • 6谷仲平,刘锟,王云杰,程庆书,罗金燕,张军.胃食管返流病食管上皮早期超微结构改变[J].第四军医大学学报,2000,21(8):994-997. 被引量:11
  • 7Villanacci V,Grigolato PG,Cestari R,et al.Dilated intercellular spaces as markers of reflux disease:histology,semiquantitative score and morphometry upon light microscopy.Digestion,2001,64:1-8.
  • 8Fass R,Fennerty MB,Vakil N.Nonerosive reflux disease-current concepts and dilemmas.Am J Gastroenterol,2001,96:303-314.
  • 9Tobey NA,Carson JL,Alkiek RA,et al.Dilated intercellular space:A morphological feature of acid reflux-damaged human esophageal epithelium.Gastroenterology,1996,111:1200-1205.
  • 10Tobey NA,Hosseini SS,Caymaz-Bor C,et al.The role of pepsin in acid injury to esophageal epithelium.Am J Gastroenterol,2001,96:3062-3070.

二级参考文献7

  • 1刘锟,王云杰,范菂,安建东,程庆书,郭仁东.食管胃吻合口的组织学病理学功能学及临床研究[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,1994,10(1):70-72. 被引量:29
  • 2徐勇勇 宇传华 陈平雁等.诊断和筛查试验的研究设计与分析[A].方积乾 主编.医学统计学与电脑实验:第2版[C].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001.327-344.
  • 3Shaw MJ, Talley N J, P, eebe TJ, et al. Initial validation of a diagnostic questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001, 96:52-57.
  • 4DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol,1999,94: 1434-1442.
  • 5Carlsson R, Dent J, Bolling-Sternevald E,et al. The usefulness of a structured questionnaire in the assessment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol, 1998, 33: 1023-1029.
  • 6Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Sciences,1988, 240 : 1285.
  • 7梁国士,卢干,康交阳,党彤,刘彬.反流性食管炎92例内镜、食管pH监测、测压、胃动力观察[J].中华消化杂志,1998,18(4):250-251. 被引量:4

共引文献480

同被引文献175

引证文献16

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部